Probability values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant and probability values less than or equal to 0.001 were considered to be extremely significant (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001).
← all phrases
“extremely significant”
In the literature
p < 0.01 indicated extremely significant differences, p < 0.05 indicated significant differences, and p > 0.05 indicated no significant differences. 3.
Statistics Statistical analysis was carried out using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric t test using GraphPad Prism 4 for Windows ( a p-value < 0.001 extremely significant; b p-value 0.001 to 0.01 very significant; c p-value 0.01 to 0.05 significant; p-value > 0.05 not significant).
p < 0.01 ** is considered to be extremely significant, p < 0.05 * is considered significant. 5.
Statistically significant differences and extremely significant differences were defined as (*) p < 0.05 and (**) p < 0.01 compared to the normal group, respectively.
p < 0.01 was considered extremely significant, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. 3.
p < 0.01 ** was considered extremely significant, and p < 0.05 * was considered significant. 3.
Statistical difference was considered significant or extremely significant at p < 0.05 or p < 0.01.
However, as the level of ethanol increased to 40, 60 or 80% (v/v), the increase in radical scavenging activity became extremely significant ( P < 0.05, except for E-WPI-80 at the protein concentration of 5.0 mg/mL).
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 was considered extremely significant, and P > 0.05 was considered not statistically significant.
Results The anti-Toxoplasma effect of the methanolic extracts were extremely significant compared to the negative control group in all exposure times (P < 0.05).
Differences were considered statistically significant or extremely significant when p < 0.05 or <0.01, respectively.
The correlation between microbial abundance and fermentation index was tested by the Pearson correlation analysis ( p < 0.01 for extremely significant correlation and p < 0.05 for significant correlation). 3.
Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software (version 20.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States); results with p < 0.01 were considered extremely significant, and those with p < 0.05 were considered significant.
p < 0.05 indicated a significant difference; p < 0.01 indicated an extremely significant difference; and p > 0.05 indicated no significant difference. 3.
Probability values of p < 0.001 were considered extremely statistically significant, p < 0.01 extremely significant and p < 0.05 statistically significant.
The significant and extremely significant levels were defined as P < .05, and P < .01, respectively.
When p < 0.01, the difference was considered extremely significant; when 0.01 < p < 0.05, the difference was considered significant; when p > 0.05, the difference was not significant.
If p < 0.0001, the effect of the parameter is considered extremely significant; if p > 0.05, the effect of the parameter is considered insignificant.
Tukey’s test, Dunnett’s test, Bonferroni’s Correction and Student’s t -test were used to calculate statistical significance, and the significance level and extremely significant level were set at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
The results are presented as the mean±standard error of the mean, with p<0.05 (*) indicating a significant difference, p<0.01 (**) and p<0.001 (***) indicating extremely significant differences, and p>0.05 indicating no significant differences.
Statistical Analysis The p values of <0.05 and <0.01 were considered statistically significant and extremely significant, respectively (* p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01).
If p < 0.05, there was significant difference; if p < 0.01, the difference was extremely significant; if p > 0.05, there was no significant difference.
The variance was calculated by t test: p < 0.05 indicated a statistical significance, and p < 0.01 indicated an extremely significant difference (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). 5.
Differences with p- values less than 0.05 and 0.01 were considered significant and extremely significant, respectively. * denotes comparisons vs. the control group ( p < 0.05). # indicates significance among different treatment groups with the model group ( p < 0.05). 3 Results 3.1 Prediction of the therapeutic mechanism of POEE that mitigates atherosclerosis First, the contents of flavonoids, alkaloids, and amino acids in POEE were determined to be 6.58, 2.17, and 86.54 mg/g DW, respectively.