“extremely significant”

Among them, the protein levels of TLR4 and MyD88 in the Bilo+Ly group were extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

Additionally, due to no fat deposition in FB stage, adipose tissues were observed in calf stage and AC stage, and the results revealed that mRNA expression levels of CFL2 gene have an extremely significant increase in adult bovine compared to that of the calf ( p < 0.01).

The circles in the figure represented the GO classification in which the differential proteins are located, with red representing extremely significant DEPs ( p value ≤ 0.01), yellow representing significant differential proteins ( p value ≤ 0.05), and blue representing non-significant enrichment.

With the increase of nitrogen fertilization, the canopy nitrogen concentration of summer corn increased, with the concentration under different nitrogen fertilizer treatments differing to an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01), but the difference between N2 and N3 treatments just reached a significant level ( p < 0.05).

* and ** above the orange column refer to significant ( P < 0.05) or extremely significant ( P < 0.01) differences (based on LSD test) between the two conditions for a given physiological trait of each sample (i.e., comparisons between each pair of blue and orange columns).

The protective factors for renal injury exhibit five extremely significant immune cell traits ( P < 0.01), namely central memory CD4 – CD8 – T cell % T cell (OR = 0.007, P = 7.83 × 10 –4 ), CD8 on central memory CD8 + T cell (OR = 0.116, P = 0.003), BAFF-R on IgD – CD38 + B cell (OR = 0.086, P = 0.006), CD4 – CD8 – NK T cell % T cell (OR = 0.068, P = 0.007), and CD25 ++ CD45RA – CD4 + non-regulatory T cell (non-Treg) absolute count (OR = 0.041, P = 0.007).

An extremely significant difference was inferred when P < 0.01.

The effects of A , B , A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 on the TOC removal efficiency are extremely significant ( P < 0.01), while those of C , AB , AC , and BC are not significant ( P > 0.05).

In all cases, these P-values are extremely significant ( P << 0.01), indicating that the gene pairs obtained by our method are much more likely to be functionally related than expected by chance.

A significant difference was considered at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.

Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between the two variables that conform to the normality and used the following marks: one asterisk (*) indicated a significant difference ( p < 0.05), and two asterisks (**) indicated an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).

The significant level was p < 0.05, and the extremely significant level was p < 0.01.

P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference, and extremely significant when p < 0.01.

Intensity of Infrared Radiation at ST25 and Control Points in Normal Rats ( Table 1 ) NC group rats showed significant differences in the intensity of infrared radiation of the left ST25 and control point at 4.00, 4.75, 5.00, 5.50, 6.25, 6.50, 6.75, 15.50, and 16.00 μ m ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant differences at 5.25 μ m ( P < 0.01).

The regression models of 17 lignans were extremely significant ( p < 0.01), expect for lappaol B ( 5 ).

Differences between treatments were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05 (*) and extremely significant when p < 0.01 (**).

The inhibition of ·OH by DIOS pretreatment exhibited an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01) compared with the positive control Trolox (IC 50 = 0.27 mM) (Figure 2 ).

* signifies a significant difference between means ( p < 0.05), and ** signifies an extremely significant difference between means ( p < 0.01). 2.9.

The P-value < 0.001(***) was considered statistically extremely significant, P-Value < 0.01 (**) was measured statistically very significant and NS = Not significant.

In present experiment, the difference in egg production between GP and DP was extremely significant ( P < 0.01), with an average of 100 eggs in GP (94–112) and 30 eggs in DP (2–50).

The significance difference level was set at p < 0.05, and the extremely significant difference level was set at p < 0.01.

In all experiments, the difference among the groups is reported as statistically significant (* p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( ** p < 0.01). 3.

5 A), but the expression of GNPNA , PGM2 , and UAP showed an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.01) at 48 h and an extremely significant decrease ( p < 0.01) at 72 h (Fig. 5 B,D,E).

Groups were compared using t tests to identify significant ( p < .05) and extremely significant differences ( p < .01). 3.

The results of this analysis showed an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) in SASP-associated cytokines PAI-1, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and VEGF in the patients with active PDR compared to the control group ( Oubaha et al., 2016 ).