“extremely significant”

P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference, and extremely significant when p < 0.01.

The significant level was p < 0.05, and the extremely significant level was p < 0.01.

Intensity of Infrared Radiation at ST25 and Control Points in Normal Rats ( Table 1 ) NC group rats showed significant differences in the intensity of infrared radiation of the left ST25 and control point at 4.00, 4.75, 5.00, 5.50, 6.25, 6.50, 6.75, 15.50, and 16.00 μ m ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant differences at 5.25 μ m ( P < 0.01).

In all cases, these P-values are extremely significant ( P << 0.01), indicating that the gene pairs obtained by our method are much more likely to be functionally related than expected by chance.

A significant difference was considered at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.

The regression models of 17 lignans were extremely significant ( p < 0.01), expect for lappaol B ( 5 ).

Differences between treatments were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05 (*) and extremely significant when p < 0.01 (**).

The P-value < 0.001(***) was considered statistically extremely significant, P-Value < 0.01 (**) was measured statistically very significant and NS = Not significant.

In present experiment, the difference in egg production between GP and DP was extremely significant ( P < 0.01), with an average of 100 eggs in GP (94–112) and 30 eggs in DP (2–50).

Differences with controls were considered statistically significant at an alpha value of P < 0.05, and extremely significant at P < 0.01.

The significance difference level was set at p < 0.05, and the extremely significant difference level was set at p < 0.01.

At the 15th day ( Figure 3C ), however, there was extremely significant difference between Aurantimicrobium and Reyranella ( p ≤ 0.01).

Data are presented as the mean ± SE of three replicates, with differences considered significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

However, a significant difference between 4-h and 0-h, and an extremely significant difference between 6-h, 8-h, and other time points ( P < 0.01, Fig. 2A ) were observed.

p values were designated as follows: **** p < 0.0001 and *** p < 0.001, extremely significant; ** p ≤ 0.01, highly significant; * p ≤ 0.05, significant; and p > 0.05, n.s.

Groups were compared using t tests to identify significant ( p < .05) and extremely significant differences ( p < .01). 3.

Extremely significant differences were set at P < 0.01 ( ∗∗ or ## ). 3.

The lignin contents of leaves, leaf sheaths, and stems of the brittle stem mutant were all lower than those of the WT, and these differences were extremely significant ( p < 0.01; Figure 1 E,F). 2.2.

The results of this analysis showed an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) in SASP-associated cytokines PAI-1, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and VEGF in the patients with active PDR compared to the control group ( Oubaha et al., 2016 ).

The model R 2 was 0.9709, both values are extremely significant ( p < 0.01), which indicates that the obtained ternary quadratic fertilizer effect function is typical and could be used for statistical purposes and fertilization recommendations.

The results showed that in pre-hierarchical and hierarchical stages, GC lipid deposition had an extremely significant ( P <0.01) correlation with time in culture ( Figure 3 A,B,D), while at 96 h, the lipid deposition in GCs in hierarchical co-culture was significantly ( P <0.01) higher than it was in mono-culture.

Compared with the Mod group, except for the LDCE group (p < 0.05), the TC content in all other treatment groups were remarkably reduced ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 1A ); there was no significant difference in TG content in the LDEAE group, while the other treatment groups showed extremely significant reductions ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 1B ); the LDL-C content in the PEE, EAE, NBE, and HDCE groups were significantly reduced ( p < 0.01), while there was no significant difference in the WE group ( Figure 1C ).

2 ). SAM/SRMS muscle strength indices The generalized SAM/SRMS form QeQc indices showed marked increase in the ACLD limb at 30°–60° knee angle, extremely significant for SRMS-QeQc at 40° and 50°( P < 0.01, d ≥ 0.892).

In all experiments, the difference among the groups is reported as statistically significant (* p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( ** p < 0.01). 3.

(1987) showed that plant height, tiller number and plant density of forage had extremely significant effects on forage yield ( p < 0.01), among which tiller number had the greatest effect.