“extremely significant”

The content of CWM for the pulp from AEW-treated longans was higher than control longans during storage with an extremely significant ( p < 0.01) difference from day 3 to day 5.

Data in all the bioassays were evaluated by Student's t-test at a univariate level, p-value<0.05 or p-value<0.01 were respectively regarded as significant differences or extremely significant differences. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 as compared to control sample.

Among them, the protein levels of TLR4 and MyD88 in the Bilo+Ly group were extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

ANOVA conducted across the environments showed an extremely significant effect ( P < 0.01) of G, E, and G × E interactions on both seed Fe and Zn content.

P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference, and extremely significant when p < 0.01.

There were extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) among four different adaptive types including aphaenopsian, semi-aphaenopsian, anophthalmic, and surface-dwelling Trechini when their adaptability to a cave environment was used as the basis for grouping.

We used both the fold change (absolute value ≥ 1) and P -value (significant ∗ , P -value ≤ 0.05; extremely significant ∗∗ , P -value ≤ 0.01) to define the significance of the expression.

5 A), but the expression of GNPNA , PGM2 , and UAP showed an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.01) at 48 h and an extremely significant decrease ( p < 0.01) at 72 h (Fig. 5 B,D,E).

Surprisingly, all of the body measurement indexes were significantly correlated ( p < 0.05); for example, the correlation between body length and chest circumference index was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

Differences were considered significant (*) for P < 0.05, highly significant (**) for P < 0.01, and extremely significant (***) for P < 0.001. 4.

In all cases, these P-values are extremely significant ( P << 0.01), indicating that the gene pairs obtained by our method are much more likely to be functionally related than expected by chance.

All differences were extremely significant ( p < 0.01). 3.3.

A significant difference was considered at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.

Additionally, due to no fat deposition in FB stage, adipose tissues were observed in calf stage and AC stage, and the results revealed that mRNA expression levels of CFL2 gene have an extremely significant increase in adult bovine compared to that of the calf ( p < 0.01).

In all experiments, the difference among the groups is reported as statistically significant (* p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( ** p < 0.01). 3.

The significant level was p < 0.05, and the extremely significant level was p < 0.01.

The protective factors for renal injury exhibit five extremely significant immune cell traits ( P < 0.01), namely central memory CD4 – CD8 – T cell % T cell (OR = 0.007, P = 7.83 × 10 –4 ), CD8 on central memory CD8 + T cell (OR = 0.116, P = 0.003), BAFF-R on IgD – CD38 + B cell (OR = 0.086, P = 0.006), CD4 – CD8 – NK T cell % T cell (OR = 0.068, P = 0.007), and CD25 ++ CD45RA – CD4 + non-regulatory T cell (non-Treg) absolute count (OR = 0.041, P = 0.007).

An extremely significant difference was inferred when P < 0.01.

The significance difference level was set at p < 0.05, and the extremely significant difference level was set at p < 0.01.

Cerebral ischemia caused an extremely significant amplification of NO generation ( p < 0.01) and NOS/cNOS/iNOS activity ( p < 0.01) both in serum and in brain tissue when compared with the controls.

These environmental factors had extremely significant correlation with the bacterial community composition ( p < 0.01). 3.2.4.

The effects of A , B , A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 on the TOC removal efficiency are extremely significant ( P < 0.01), while those of C , AB , AC , and BC are not significant ( P > 0.05).

However, a significant difference between 4-h and 0-h, and an extremely significant difference between 6-h, 8-h, and other time points ( P < 0.01, Fig. 2A ) were observed.

Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between the two variables that conform to the normality and used the following marks: one asterisk (*) indicated a significant difference ( p < 0.05), and two asterisks (**) indicated an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).

Groups were compared using t tests to identify significant ( p < .05) and extremely significant differences ( p < .01). 3.