“extremely significant”

5 , all key taste metabolites exhibited extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) between cultivars, which was similar to the metabolomics results.

Two benzothiophene and L-(+)-valine, ethyl mercury ions were extremely significant positive correlation ( P < 0.01), aminomethyl phosphonic acid and ethyl mercury ions were significantly negative correlation ( P < 0.05), sucrose and 6-hydroxy-1,2-adipic acid dioctyl ester, misha ossification alcohol, 2-ammonia-4-oxygen generation butyrate were extremely significant positive correlation ( P < 0.01), and (3R, 4S, 9R, 11R)-27-(4-hydroxy phenyl)-4-methyl-3,9,11-seven alkoxy three alcohol has significant negative correlation ( P < 0.05; Tables 2 – 4 ).

C18:1 and C20:1 showed a significantly positive correlation with MeJA ( p < 0.05) and C18:2 and C18:3 showed an extremely significant positive correlation ( p < 0.01); however, C18:0 was significantly and negatively correlated ( p < 0.05).

The circles in the figure represented the GO classification in which the differential proteins are located, with red representing extremely significant DEPs ( p value ≤ 0.01), yellow representing significant differential proteins ( p value ≤ 0.05), and blue representing non-significant enrichment.

epigeios in 2018 and 2019, all differences between the two treatments reached a significant ( P < 0.05) or extremely significant ( P < 0.01) level.

Statistical analysis All values were presented as mean ± SEM, and statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) and extremely significant differences (p < 0.01) among cadmium chloride-treated groups and the control were determined among various groups by ANOVA and Tukey post-test using SPSS 12.0 statistical software.

The difference was significant if P < 0.05, extremely significant if P < 0.01, and nonsignificant if P > 0.05.

In each cropping period the difference in each index to alfalfa was extremely significant under J, P treatment and J × P interactive treatment ( P < 0.01).

However, the interaction between them has different influences on them, specifically, it has extremely significant influence on VBD and VBD/RD ( p < 0.01, Table 3 ), significant influence on XA and NV ( p < 0.05, Table 2 ), but no influence on RD, CT and C/R ( p > 0.05, Table 2 ).

Among them, the protein levels of TLR4 and MyD88 in the Bilo+Ly group were extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

Two species with more than 5 distribution sites had significant positive correlations with altitude, and distance between population and road ( P <0.05), but had extremely significant negative correlations with agricultural activities ( P <0.01) ( Table 2 ).

The content of CWM for the pulp from AEW-treated longans was higher than control longans during storage with an extremely significant ( p < 0.01) difference from day 3 to day 5.

P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference, and extremely significant when p < 0.01.

5 A), but the expression of GNPNA , PGM2 , and UAP showed an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.01) at 48 h and an extremely significant decrease ( p < 0.01) at 72 h (Fig. 5 B,D,E).

All differences were extremely significant ( p < 0.01). 3.3.

The significant level was p < 0.05, and the extremely significant level was p < 0.01.

In all cases, these P-values are extremely significant ( P << 0.01), indicating that the gene pairs obtained by our method are much more likely to be functionally related than expected by chance.

A significant difference was considered at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.

In all experiments, differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

The significance level was P < 0.05, the extremely significant level was P < 0.01, the difference was not significant if P > 0.05.

The apoptosis rate was extremely significant ( P < 0.01) at doses of 100 and 200 μg/mL compared with the control group.

ANOVA conducted across the environments showed an extremely significant effect ( P < 0.01) of G, E, and G × E interactions on both seed Fe and Zn content.

In addition, drought type, precipitation, and temperature had extremely significant partial correlations with the drought response of GY ( P ≤ 0.01), with partial correlation coefficients of −0.60, 0.57, and −0.44, respectively ( Figure 3B ).

Although the removal efficiencies of nitrate nitrogen under all temperature conditions was above 97%, the t -test showed that there was an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) between nitrate removal of T52, T35, T25 and that of T10 (Table S2 † ).

There were extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) among four different adaptive types including aphaenopsian, semi-aphaenopsian, anophthalmic, and surface-dwelling Trechini when their adaptability to a cave environment was used as the basis for grouping.