“extremely significant”

Besides, the corresponding volumes of hippocampi in hippocampal subregions in I-MCI group were significantly reduced compared with those in normal group, and the comparison between the two groups indicated extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).

The effect of additives on the in vitro DM digestibility of Stylosanthes silage for 48 h was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

The significant differences were shown as P<0.05, and the extremely significant differences were shown as P <0.01.

The trends were further categorised into the following categories: insignificant increase ( β ≥ 0, P > 0.05); significant increase ( β ≥ 0, 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05); extremely significant increase ( β ≥ 0, P ≤ 0.01); insignificant decrease ( β < 0, P > 0.05); significant decrease ( β < 0, 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05); and extremely significant decrease ( β < 0, P ≤ 0.01).

In the stems, there was no significant change in length among the four types of seedlings, but the diameter of the seedlings treated with stress was thinner than that of the control on the sixth and ninth days of treatment and showed significant ( P < 0.05) or extremely significant ( P < 0.01) differences.

The Results of Monomer Units and Antioxidant Activities Analysis Firstly, the F test showed that the standardized empirical linear regression equation between the monomer units of Rhodiola crenulata PAs and antioxidant activity was extremely significant ( p ≤ 0.01 ).

Among them, the protein levels of TLR4 and MyD88 in the Bilo+Ly group were extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

“*” was considered significant difference ( p < 0.05); “**” was considered extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01). 3.

The results showed that the antibiotic concentrations in feed had an extremely significant correlation ( p < 0.01) with the antibiotic concentrations in pig wastes.

MDA had a significant positive correlation with topological index ( P< 0.05), significant negative correlation with total root length, total root surface area and root forks ( P< 0.05), and extremely significant negative correlation with fractal abundance and root tips ( P < 0.01).

“**” indicate an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01 by the Student’s t-test), “*” indicate a significant difference ( P < 0.05 by the Student’s t-test).

Compared with group F, group C and group S have extremely significant differences in T1, T2, T3, and T4 angiotensin II ( P < 0.01); group B and group C are compared at T1, T2, T3, and T4.

P < 0.05 Differences was defined as significant, very/extremely significant when P < 0.01 and P < 0.001.

All differences were extremely significant ( p < 0.01). 3.3.

C18:1 and C20:1 showed a significantly positive correlation with MeJA ( p < 0.05) and C18:2 and C18:3 showed an extremely significant positive correlation ( p < 0.01); however, C18:0 was significantly and negatively correlated ( p < 0.05).

5 A), but the expression of GNPNA , PGM2 , and UAP showed an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.01) at 48 h and an extremely significant decrease ( p < 0.01) at 72 h (Fig. 5 B,D,E).

Differences were considered significant at * p < 0.05, highly significant at ** p < 0.01, and extremely significant for *** p < 0.001. 3.

At the same time, statistical analysis showed an extremely significant difference (P<0.01) in LDH activity in the culture medium between the CA-treated groups.

* signifies a significant difference between means ( p < 0.05), and ** signifies an extremely significant difference between means ( p < 0.01). 2.9.

The difference was significant if P < 0.05, extremely significant if P < 0.01, and nonsignificant if P > 0.05.

However, the interaction between them has different influences on them, specifically, it has extremely significant influence on VBD and VBD/RD ( p < 0.01, Table 3 ), significant influence on XA and NV ( p < 0.05, Table 2 ), but no influence on RD, CT and C/R ( p > 0.05, Table 2 ).

Two species with more than 5 distribution sites had significant positive correlations with altitude, and distance between population and road ( P <0.05), but had extremely significant negative correlations with agricultural activities ( P <0.01) ( Table 2 ).

The significant level was p < 0.05, and the extremely significant level was p < 0.01.

The expression of IRF4 in the spleen and brain of Cherry Valley ducks reached extremely significant differences at 1, 3, 5 dpi with DTMUV ( P < 0.01), and the upregulation reached the maximum on the third day in the spleen (96.5-fold, P < 0.01; Figure 4 A); the maximum upregulation (1,572.4-fold, P < 0.01; Figure 4 B) in the brain at 5 dpi.

A significant difference was considered at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.