“extremely significant”

The change in the thickness of respiratory tree was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

Two homozygous genotypes of other SNPs presented extremely significant associated with corresponding traits ( p < 0.01).

It can be seen from Table 2 that, among those three factors affecting plant height increment, the main effect of different ‘salt stress degrees’ was extremely significant ( P < 0.01), while the main effect of ‘varieties’ and ‘spraying GABA or not’ was least significant ( P > 0.05), with which the P value of ‘spraying GABA or not’ was 0.055.

For the duodenum, we found that the abundance of 29 KEGG pathways was significantly different between the control and heat-treated ducks ( P < 0.05), among which the abundance of 8 pathways was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

2014 ) received very high CorrScores, resulting in extremely significant P values ( P < 0.01).

As seen in Table I , there were no significant differences in the expression levels of hsa_circRNA_103135, hsa_circRNA_103137 and hsa_circRNA_101116 (P>0.05), but there were extremely significant differences in the expression levels of hsa_circRNA_103127, hsa_circRNA_103112 and hsa_circRNA_104907 (P<0.01) between six children with DS and six children without DS.

Differences were considered statistically significant at P <0.05, and extremely significant at P <0.01.

coli K88 infection induced an apparently ( p < 0.05) down-regulated expression of Lf in some tissues (spleen, bone and muscle), but an extremely significant ( p < 0.01) up-regulation in other tissues (liver and kidney) ( Figure 3 A).

The level of statistical significance was set to a significant difference ( p < 0.05) and an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).

The R 2 value between the observed and estimated AGB was 0.86, being extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

From the regression coefficients and p ‐value, the order of influence of various factors on the embedding efficiency of functional oil microcapsules was as follows: proportion of HACS ( X 2 ) > functional oil concentration ( X 1 ) > proportion of monoglyceride in emulsifier ( X 3 ), and the impact of various factors on the embedding efficiency is extremely significant ( p < .01) (Table 3 ), and the MEE response surface graphs are shown in Figure 1 .

Differences were considered significant when * p < 0.05 and extremely significant when ** p < 0.01.

After multiple comparison, there were significant differences between Groups A and B ( P = 0.028) and Groups A and C ( P = 0.012), but there was no significant difference between Groups B and C ( P = 0.769); there were extremely significant differences between 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months in Group A, Group B, and Group C, respectively (all P < 0.01).

Germination Test and Seedling Growth Test According to a comparative analysis of the physiological indices of ten seeds from the 24 maize hybrid seed lots of eight cultivars, the indices of three seed lots of the same cultivar all exhibited the same trend in change: 2023 seed lot > 2022 seed lot > 2021 seed lot; the differences in the vigour indices (such as the GI and VI) among the three seed lots of the same cultivar were significant ( p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

The difference was considered to be significant when p was <0.05, and the difference was considered to be extremely significant when p was <0.01 ( ## p < 0.01 is vs. the control group; * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 are vs. model group).

The production of yellow pigment in Δ mokE was significantly higher ( p < 0.01) than that of MS-1, while the yellow pigment of PgpdA-mokE was extremely significant lower ( p < 0.01) than that of MS-1, and the content of red pigment was also significant ( p < 0.05) lower than that of MS-1 on the 3rd, 9th, and 11th days ( Figure 12 ).

When there were significant differences ( p < 0.05), and there were extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01), the group means were further compared using Duncan’s multiple range test, and the results are presented in a histogram prepared in GraphPad Prism 6.0. 3.

Difference was considered statistically significant with a value of p<0.05, and extremely significant with a value of p<0.01.

Our findings showed that genetic variations among the 44 genotypes were extremely significant ( P < 0.01) for all characteristics, demonstrating the existence of considerable genetic variation among all genotypes; thus, additional subsequent research was carried out to evaluate the combining ability [ 31 , 41 – 49 ].

** Represented an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) 3.

The results showed that there were extremely significant differences in EPQ extraversion factors among the people treated with the educational intervention of art psychology course ( P < 0.01), and there was no significant change in other factors ( P > 0.05).

However, results presented extremely significant difference (p ≤ 0.01) in the ginsenosides yields between the two group of cultivation sites, but all presented Cluster A > Cluster B.

Compared with the controls, the fish in Ll:pSLC-G group had a significantly lower viral load on the 1st day post-challenge ( p < 0.05), and extremely significant difference was detected on the 3rd day ( p < 0.01).

In comparison with the model group, a concentration-dependent increase in thymic and splenic indices was observed in LH-6-treated immunosuppressed mice, and the thymus and spleen indices of the 200 mg/kg LH-6 group were extremely significant ( p < 0.01), demonstrating that LH-6 has a certain repairing effect on CTX-induced damage to immune organs. 3.2.

There is an extremely significant correlation between the ratio of gestational sac volume to germ volume and pregnancy abortion rate ( P < 0.01).