“extremely significant”

Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05 and extremely significant when P < 0.01.

The results showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) in egg number at 300 days, average egg production rate at 300 days (Fig. 1 and Table 1 ) and significant differences ( P < 0.05) in age at first egg and the number of hierarchical follicles between LEP and HEP groups.

After treatment with different doses of Ext-epi, the BMC and BMD of the femur are significantly higher than model rats, among which the ZL-IL group has an extremely significant difference (p<0.01), the contents of OC, TNF-α, and TRAP in the serum of rats in the model group are higher than sham-operation group, and the contents of E2 decreased significantly (p<0.01).

Results Characterization of physicochemical properties of different species of litter There were extremely significant differences in Dw ( p < 0.01, F = 3296.941), total C ( p < 0.01, F = 20.538), total P ( p < 0.05, F = 7.668), C/N ( p < 0.01, F = 68.247), N/P ( p < 0.01, F = 21.415), and C/P ( p < 0.01, F = 26.931) among the three types of leaf litter, but there was no significant difference in the content of total N ( p > 0.05, F = 4.355), as shown in Table 1 .

Importantly, the T-IDF high-dose group showed significant differences from the model group ( p < 0.05), while the T-IDF middle-dose group showed extremely significant differences compared with the model group ( p < 0.01).

Ultimately, a sequence depth for the parents of greater than 10-fold was achieved, with over 70% integrity of SLAF tags and exclusion from the final map of markers showing extremely significant (p < 0.01) segregation distortion.

Extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) were observed for the two index values tZR and ABA in the calyx abscission zones of both varieties from 21 April to 25 April, with the content in the calyx abscission zone of the YB variety significantly higher than that of the PT variety ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 2 A,B).

There is an extremely significant correlation between the ratio of gestational sac volume to germ volume and pregnancy abortion rate ( P < 0.01).

The R 2 value between the observed and estimated AGB was 0.86, being extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

Among these candidates, 22 circRNAs (10 from TNcircles and 12 from RNcircles) were further selected based on the extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01; Figs 2 C and EV1 ).

In regional grouping, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed that there was an extremely significant difference in Shannon indices between the groups JN and WH ( P < 0.01) and a significant difference between the groups LY and WH ( P < 0.05).

This was expressed as mean ± SD; the statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 and was extremely significant at p < 0.01.

Differences were assumed to be extremely significant (***) if the probability ( p ) value was <0.001, very significant (**) if p < 0.01, significant (*) if p < 0.05, and not significant (N.S.) if p ≥ 0.05.

Significant changes were defined as * p < 0.05 and extremely significant changes as ** p < 0.01.

An extremely significant negative correlation was observed between TN and SO 4 2− for overlying-water aeration (coefficient: − 0.88 ( P < 0.01)) and sediment-aerated river simulation (coefficient: − 0.86 ( P < 0.01)).

The difference in ciliostasis was extremely significant between the SZ200-vaccinated group and the unvaccinated group (p < 0.01).

The level of statistical significance was set to a significant difference ( p < 0.05) and an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).

The results revealed extremely significant differences in bacterial communities ( P < 0.01) between the L.WK4 and L.WK6 groups ( Figure 3A ), between the F.WK4 and L.WK4 groups ( Figure 3B ), between the F.WK4 and F.WK6 groups ( Figure 3C ), and between the F.WK6 and L.WK6 groups ( Figure 3D ).

2014 ) received very high CorrScores, resulting in extremely significant P values ( P < 0.01).

The change in the thickness of respiratory tree was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

Differences were considered statistically significant at P <0.05, and extremely significant at P <0.01.

Two homozygous genotypes of other SNPs presented extremely significant associated with corresponding traits ( p < 0.01).

In addition, as fluctuation in the temperature of the storage environment increased, the correlation between some indicators was enhanced, for example, the correlation between ADP and some indicators (such as EL, MDA, O 2 · − , H 2 O 2 , etc.) changed from significant ( p < 0.05) to extremely significant ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 8 A–C).

coli K88 infection induced an apparently ( p < 0.05) down-regulated expression of Lf in some tissues (spleen, bone and muscle), but an extremely significant ( p < 0.01) up-regulation in other tissues (liver and kidney) ( Figure 3 A).

For the duodenum, we found that the abundance of 29 KEGG pathways was significantly different between the control and heat-treated ducks ( P < 0.05), among which the abundance of 8 pathways was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).