Barely Significant
← all phrases

“extremely significant”

7,788 sentences · 7,788 papers · 14,688 search hits before verification

In the literature

extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
Results Characterization of physicochemical properties of different species of litter There were extremely significant differences in Dw ( p < 0.01, F = 3296.941), total C ( p < 0.01, F = 20.538), total P ( p < 0.05, F = 7.668), C/N ( p < 0.01, F = 68.247), N/P ( p < 0.01, F = 21.415), and C/P ( p < 0.01, F = 26.931) among the three types of leaf litter, but there was no significant difference in the content of total N ( p > 0.05, F = 4.355), as shown in Table 1 .
extremely significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
It can be seen from Table 2 that, among those three factors affecting plant height increment, the main effect of different ‘salt stress degrees’ was extremely significant ( P < 0.01), while the main effect of ‘varieties’ and ‘spraying GABA or not’ was least significant ( P > 0.05), with which the P value of ‘spraying GABA or not’ was 0.055.
extremely significantP<0.010.2× alphaqualified
As seen in Table I , there were no significant differences in the expression levels of hsa_circRNA_103135, hsa_circRNA_103137 and hsa_circRNA_101116 (P>0.05), but there were extremely significant differences in the expression levels of hsa_circRNA_103127, hsa_circRNA_103112 and hsa_circRNA_104907 (P<0.01) between six children with DS and six children without DS.
extremely significantp < .010.2× alphaqualified
From the regression coefficients and p ‐value, the order of influence of various factors on the embedding efficiency of functional oil microcapsules was as follows: proportion of HACS ( X 2 ) > functional oil concentration ( X 1 ) > proportion of monoglyceride in emulsifier ( X 3 ), and the impact of various factors on the embedding efficiency is extremely significant ( p < .01) (Table 3 ), and the MEE response surface graphs are shown in Figure 1 .
extremely significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
After multiple comparison, there were significant differences between Groups A and B ( P = 0.028) and Groups A and C ( P = 0.012), but there was no significant difference between Groups B and C ( P = 0.769); there were extremely significant differences between 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months in Group A, Group B, and Group C, respectively (all P < 0.01).
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
Germination Test and Seedling Growth Test According to a comparative analysis of the physiological indices of ten seeds from the 24 maize hybrid seed lots of eight cultivars, the indices of three seed lots of the same cultivar all exhibited the same trend in change: 2023 seed lot > 2022 seed lot > 2021 seed lot; the differences in the vigour indices (such as the GI and VI) among the three seed lots of the same cultivar were significant ( p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( p < 0.01).
extremely significantp ≤ 0.010.2× alphaqualified
However, results presented extremely significant difference (p ≤ 0.01) in the ginsenosides yields between the two group of cultivation sites, but all presented Cluster A > Cluster B.
extremely significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
The results showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) in egg number at 300 days, average egg production rate at 300 days (Fig. 1 and Table 1 ) and significant differences ( P < 0.05) in age at first egg and the number of hierarchical follicles between LEP and HEP groups.
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
Correlation Analysis Between Nutrient Contents and Stoichiometric Characteristics of Different Components of Main Shrubs and Herbs in Karst Forests As shown in Figure 5 , for the stoichiometric characteristics of shrub leaves, the positive correlation groups were as follows: C content was significantly ( p < 0.05) positively correlated with C/K (r = 0.54); there were significant ( p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( p < 0.01) positive correlations between N content and P (r = 0.68), Ca (r = 0.62), and Mg (r = 0.60) contents, as well as between P content and Ca (r = 0.67) and Mg (r = 0.46) contents; K content was extremely significantly ( p < 0.01) positively correlated with K/P (r = 0.73); Ca content was significantly ( p < 0.05) or extremely significantly ( p < 0.01) positively correlated with Mg (r = 0.79), N/K (r = 0.61), and Ca/Mg (r = 0.47).