“extremely significant”

The reductions of hepcidin in the 15 dP, 18 dP, 21 dP, 1 dL, and 7 dL groups were extremely significant ( P < 0.01), while no significances were shown in the 14 dL and 21 dL groups.

The expression at 6 h and 12 h showed an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 1 ).

The toxicity results were analyzed by Tukey’s test, and 95% confidence level analysis was performed using the statistics program SPSS; the evaluated P values were indicated by the symbols a (extremely significant difference, p < 0.01), b (significant difference, p < 0.05), and c (no significant difference, p > 0.05).

The result revealed that genotypes (G–T, C–T, A–G, C–T, and G–T) of five SNPs, including rs325760894, rs81382100, rs320502793, SSC14:42805887, and rs705385434, presented extremely significant associated ( p < 0.01) with corresponding traits.

Notably, another alkene, α-curcumene, showed extremely significant positive correlations with W3S and W5S sensors ( P < 0.01) and significant positive correlations with W1S (sensitive to methyl) and W2S (sensitive to alcohols, aldehydes, and ketones) sensors ( P < 0.05).

The results show that the treadmill, rotarod, and swimming time in PE, GA, and EA groups is significantly prolonged, which has extremely significant differences compared to the model group (p < 0.01).

However, compared to group I, streptococcus and roseburia were significantly different at p < 0.05, while prevotella, SMB53, and phascolarctobacterium were extremely significant different at p < 0.01 in group M ( Figure 6 C).

There were extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) in the granule size distribution of the three corn flours ( Table 1 ).

They also exhibited significant correlations with seed width and particle size ( p < 0.05 ), and extremely significant correlations with individual seed weight, seed width, and surface area ( p < 0.01 ).

The different lowercase letters represented significant differences between groups ( P < 0.05), and the different capital letters represented extremely significant differences between groups ( P < 0.01).

An asterisk represented a significant difference ( ∗p < 0.05), and two asterisks represent extremely significant differences ( ∗∗p < 0.01) in the figures.

‘*’ indicates the relationship between the characteristics reached a significant level ( P < 0.05) and ‘**’ indicates the relationship between the characteristics reached an extremely significant level ( P < 0.01).

In this study, genes showing the same or similar expression trends at the same time points in three independent chip assays, at least a 3-fold change in expression level, and a significant (P≤0.05), or even extremely significant (P≤0.01), difference between the PH groups and SO groups are referred to as genes differentially expressed during LR.

As can be seen from Figure 1 D, the sugar partiality of the ASPS group, EE group, syringin group and positive control group was, respectively, 58.04%, 63.02%, 61.62% and 60.72%, which were extremely significant compared with the model group ( p < 0.01).

Correlation between Nutritional Quality and Functional Quality According to Table 6 , the highest and extremely significant positive correlation was between ash content and rutin content (r = 0.4480, p < 0.01).

Using the stem as a control, expression was barely detected in the root, while it was about 26 times higher in the fruit, reaching an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01). 3.

P values < 0.001 (a) were considered extremely significant, P values < 0.01 (b) very significant and P values < 0.05 (c) were considered statistically significant.

On the 14th day of modeling, compared with the blank group, the apparent score of the model group was further increased, with an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01), suggesting the successful establishment of deficiency-cold syndrome model.

The linear term x 1 (initial pH) had an extremely significant effect on TA production ( p < 0.01), followed by x 3 (temperature) ( p < 0.05).

The Main Xylanases Displayed Low Degrees of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn AX Based on the corn–soybean meal–DDGS composite substrates, with the increase of the supplement levels of EX1, both RS and IVDMD showed extremely significant quadratic curve changes ( p < 0.01, R 2 > 0.9) at the level of 54 U/g to achieve the highest enzymatic hydrolysis extent ( Figure 1 A,B).

It can be seen from Figure 3A that the cell viability of P9 at a lower concentration (6.25 μM) began to decrease significantly ( p < 0.05), and the cell viability of 25, 50, 100, and 200 μM also decreased significantly, with extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01).

and showed an extremely significant positive correlation with SSa and SSd in the leaves of CBC3 (p < 0.01).

The use of different letters such as “a” and “b” indicates significant differences at the p < 0.05 level; “**” indicates extremely significant difference at the p < 0.01 level, “*” indicates significant difference at the p < 0.05 level, and “ns” indicates no significant difference between the two groups. 3.

The values, means ± SD (MS: n = 12, FH: n = 21), in the same row with different lowercase showed statistically significant differences ( P < 0.05) and the values labeled with different capital letters represent extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01) according to the Kruskal–Wallis test, the same as below. 2.5.

The difference in weight between the male and female populations was also extremely significant ( p < 0.01). 3.5.