“extremely significant”

The different lowercase letters represented significant differences between groups ( P < 0.05), and the different capital letters represented extremely significant differences between groups ( P < 0.01).

Differences were considered significant at p <0.05 (*) and extremely significant at p <0.01 (**).

On the 14th day of modeling, compared with the blank group, the apparent score of the model group was further increased, with an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01), suggesting the successful establishment of deficiency-cold syndrome model.

In this study, genes showing the same or similar expression trends at the same time points in three independent chip assays, at least a 3-fold change in expression level, and a significant (P≤0.05), or even extremely significant (P≤0.01), difference between the PH groups and SO groups are referred to as genes differentially expressed during LR.

P values < 0.001 (a) were considered extremely significant, P values < 0.01 (b) very significant and P values < 0.05 (c) were considered statistically significant.

As can be seen from Figure 1 D, the sugar partiality of the ASPS group, EE group, syringin group and positive control group was, respectively, 58.04%, 63.02%, 61.62% and 60.72%, which were extremely significant compared with the model group ( p < 0.01).

The content of 1,8-cineole in leaves was about 8.3 times higher than that in stems, and 13.5 times higher than that in roots, showed an extremely significant difference ( p- value < 0.01).

Using the stem as a control, expression was barely detected in the root, while it was about 26 times higher in the fruit, reaching an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01). 3.

The use of different letters such as “a” and “b” indicates significant differences at the p < 0.05 level; “**” indicates extremely significant difference at the p < 0.01 level, “*” indicates significant difference at the p < 0.05 level, and “ns” indicates no significant difference between the two groups. 3.

The difference in weight between the male and female populations was also extremely significant ( p < 0.01). 3.5.

and showed an extremely significant positive correlation with SSa and SSd in the leaves of CBC3 (p < 0.01).

LC = 62.58 + 1.45 × A + 1.67 × B + 1.55× AB − 2.88 × A 2 − 3.63 × B 2 The quadratic polynomial regression equation between the EE and the two factors was as follows: EE = 84.34 + 1.58 × A + 2.12 × B + 0.2500 × AB − 3.99 × A 2 − 3.79 × B 2 While the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05), the differences between the various treatments of the EE and LC models were extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

There were 29 pairwise F ST values (BJ-FR, BJ-QHD, BJ-XC, BJ-HS, BJ-CT, BJ-GZL, BJ-DH, BJ-HRB, TJ-CC, XTS-CC, XTS-HRB, RF-XC, FR-HS, FR-CT, FR-GZL, FR-CC, FR-HRB, XL-CC, QHD-XC, QHD-HS, QHD-CT, QHD-HRB, XC-CT, XC-DH, XC-HRB, HS-CT, HS-HRB, CT-HRB, and TL-CC) showing significant differences ( P < 0.05), 5 of which (BJ-CT, BJ-HRB, FR-CC, FR-HRB, and XC-HRB) showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).

The values, means ± SD (MS: n = 12, FH: n = 21), in the same row with different lowercase showed statistically significant differences ( P < 0.05) and the values labeled with different capital letters represent extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01) according to the Kruskal–Wallis test, the same as below. 2.5.

In addition, the correlation analysis confirmed that pH was negatively significantly correlated with TN, AN, and NH 4 + -N ( P < 0.05), and there were significant or extremely significant positive relationships among SOC, TN, AN, NH 4 + -N, and AP ( P < 0.01, 0.05; Fig. 3 ).

Extremely significant differences were indicated by p < 0.01, significant differences by p < 0.05, and non-significant differences by p > 0.05.

As can be seen from Table 4 , The influence of seed-seed rolling friction coefficient and seed-steel rolling friction coefficient on the angle of repose in simulation experiment is extremely significant (P<0 . 01) .

In particular, the AGR showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) at almost every growth stage (Fig. 1 E).

Statistically significant differences were designated at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

T tests revealed significant differences among the three groups ( P < 0.05), with an extremely significant difference in IMP content between the DZ and XM groups ( P < 0.01). 16S rRNA gene sequencing results The sequencing results are summarized in Table 2 .

The one-way ANOVA test was utilized to analyze comparisons between multiple groups, and Duncan’s method was used to demonstrate the significance of the data, where “*” means a significant difference ( p < 0.05) and “**” means an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01). 3.

As shown in Figure 3 and Table 2 , most of the amino acids, except Pro, Met, and Tyr, displayed an extremely significant positive correlation with components: VFC42, VFC34, VFC43, and VFC26( p < 0.01).

Reject the null hypothesis if Sd/S is significantly greater (negative selection) or smaller (positive selection) than Nd/N, as indicated by P-value < 0.05, and extremely significant if P -value < 0.01.

Relative protein expression of mesenchymal markers Vimentin and α-SMA in the siESRP1 groups indicated great increases with extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).

Among them, COL5A1, VCAN, PTGS2, and ITGAV showed extremely significant increases ( P < 0.01); ITGA8 was significantly decreased in the plaque group and thrombosis group ( P < 0.01).