“extremely significant”

The reduction was extremely significant ( p < 0.01, Tukey-Kramer test) at WC = 9.33% where it occurred at light intensity of ca. 1,500–2,000 μmol m -2 s -1 .

LS-HPC and starch were found to have extremely significant ( p < 0.01) and significant ( p < 0.05) effects on the bolus dissolution time, respectively.

Statistical significance was considered to be significant ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

In S3, except erucic acid (FFA22:1), other components had extremely significant differences in T1 and T2 (p < 0.01), and the contents in T2 were higher than in T1 ( Figures 1C,D ).

Relative protein expression of mesenchymal markers Vimentin and α-SMA in the siESRP1 groups indicated great increases with extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).

R 2 values were much lower in the first ratoon crop than the second crop, and the scatterplots of the first crop were much more concentrated than in the second crop, but the correlation coefficient (r) was extremely significant (P<0.01) as shown in S1 Table .

Additionally, there was a significant difference in the total FG% between the intervention players at the 1st week and the 9th week ( χ 2 = 127.032, P = 0.000), and the difference in the FG% of the three shooting techniques was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

The difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

There were extremely significant differences among the temperature stress treatments ( p < 0.01).

Notably, another alkene, α-curcumene, showed extremely significant positive correlations with W3S and W5S sensors ( P < 0.01) and significant positive correlations with W1S (sensitive to methyl) and W2S (sensitive to alcohols, aldehydes, and ketones) sensors ( P < 0.05).

The result revealed that genotypes (G–T, C–T, A–G, C–T, and G–T) of five SNPs, including rs325760894, rs81382100, rs320502793, SSC14:42805887, and rs705385434, presented extremely significant associated ( p < 0.01) with corresponding traits.

The results show that the treadmill, rotarod, and swimming time in PE, GA, and EA groups is significantly prolonged, which has extremely significant differences compared to the model group (p < 0.01).

The toxicity results were analyzed by Tukey’s test, and 95% confidence level analysis was performed using the statistics program SPSS; the evaluated P values were indicated by the symbols a (extremely significant difference, p < 0.01), b (significant difference, p < 0.05), and c (no significant difference, p > 0.05).

Difference was considered statistically significant when P < 0.05, whereas less than 0.01 were considered extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

‘*’and ‘**’ represent significant difference ( P ≤ 0.05) and extremely significant difference ( P ≤ 0.01), respectively.

An extremely significant difference was observed between the group receiving free Ptx and the group receiving Ptx nanoparticles ( P < 0.01) or Ptx/Tet nanoparticles ( P < 0.01).

The different lowercase letters represented significant differences between groups ( P < 0.05), and the different capital letters represented extremely significant differences between groups ( P < 0.01).

As shown in Figure 3 A,B, compared with the control group, the expression of ovarian FSHR in the Mel group was significantly increased ( p < 0.05), extremely significant increase in FSH group and FSH+Mel group ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 3 A,B).

The significance level was p < 0.05, and the extremely significant level was p < 0.01.

On the 14th day of modeling, compared with the blank group, the apparent score of the model group was further increased, with an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01), suggesting the successful establishment of deficiency-cold syndrome model.

One-way ANOVA analysis of serum and salivary LDH and ALP between control, HNSCC revealed an extremely significant difference in serum and salivary ALPand LDH (P <0.01) only between the groups which is in agreement with the findings of Pereira et al., (2015).

P values < 0.001 (a) were considered extremely significant, P values < 0.01 (b) very significant and P values < 0.05 (c) were considered statistically significant.

It was interesting that 11 among the rest 13 genes presenting extremely significant overexpressed pattern in liver cancers as compared to that in the adjacent liver tissues (P<0.01; Table IV ; Fig. 13A-K ), such as CACNA1E, HTR4, CACNA1C, CHRM3, OXTR, CACNA1I, CACNA1A, CHRFAM7A, PTGER3, TACR1, CAMK2A.

As can be seen from Figure 1 D, the sugar partiality of the ASPS group, EE group, syringin group and positive control group was, respectively, 58.04%, 63.02%, 61.62% and 60.72%, which were extremely significant compared with the model group ( p < 0.01).

Using the stem as a control, expression was barely detected in the root, while it was about 26 times higher in the fruit, reaching an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01). 3.