“extremely significant”

In addition, Spearman’s rank-order correlation showed that the samples in different locations of the same habitat had extremely significant positive correlation ( p < 0.01).

Temperature exhibited an extremely significant effect (F = 60.22, p < 0.01), while reaction time and water/castor oil ratio were not statistically significant within the investigated ranges, consistent with the range analysis.

The data was considered significant if P values <0.05, and extremely significant if P values <0.01.

tzumu populations were extremely significant correlation ( r = 0.58, p < 0.01, see Fig. 4 a).

Different lactation periods showed extremely significant effects on MFP, MPP, LR, MUN, and SCS ( p < 0.01). 3.1.2.

Among the three groups, the M-G scored the highest, the CC-G scored the lowest, and the difference in most items was extremely significant ( p < 0.01) except IS, Hos, and PI ( p < 0.05).

Data are represented as the mean ± SD of triplicate independent experiments and statistically extremely significant differences compared with the negative control (** P < 0.01).

We also used the LSD multi-group range test method for multiple comparisons and Pearson correlation analysis to test the correlation differences between each two groups, with a significance level of p < 0.05 and an extremely significant level of p < 0.01.

The paired t-test results showed that the subjective fatigue evaluation after the test was significantly higher than that before the test, and there were extremely significant differences in the subjective fatigue scores of the subjects in terms of eye symptoms, headache symptoms, and body pain ( p < 0.01), as shown in Table 1 .

The comparison between the C and B Group, on the third day showed that the difference was extremely significant (t=5.32, P <0.01).

More attention was paid to the modules possessing extremely significant correlations with traits ( p < 0.01) to compute the association of GS, which represents the correlation between genes and traits, with MM representing the correlation of the module eigengene and the gene expression profile.

The reflectance of films A and B were about 2.2 times that of film C, and the difference reached an extremely significant level ( P < 0.01).

For the index of leakage rate, the horizontal transplanting operation speed and the length of feeding have a significant effect ( P < 0.05); Inclined transplanting operation speed have a significant influence (0.01 ≤ P ≤ 0.05) and the length of feeding have extremely significant influence ( P < 0.01).

Difference was considered statistically significant when P < 0.05, whereas less than 0.01 were considered extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

However, in comparing other morphological characteristics, including root length, root diameter, dry to wet mass ratio of leaves, and dry to wet mass ratio of roots, Longyou6 and Longyou7 values were higher than Tianyou2 and Tianyou4, and the difference was significant ( P < 0.05) or extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

The relationship between pelagic and demersal fish of OFX concentration was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

However, the p95 (10 4.5 EID 50 ) group showed ciliary movement stagnation and ciliary shedding, and the difference was extremely significant compared with the negative control group ( P < 0.01), while there was no significant difference in the tracheal ciliary motility between the p105 (10 4.5 EID 50 )-vaccinated group and the non-vaccinated control group ( P > 0.05), illustrating that p105 generation is more suitable for vaccine development.

SFW had extremely significant positive correlations with TD and VD of fruits ( P <0.01).

papyrifera had extremely significant effects on the monthly average height of plantlets ( p < 0.01), while the root segment length and diameter had significant effects on the absorbing root’s formation rate ( p < 0.05).

LS-HPC and starch were found to have extremely significant ( p < 0.01) and significant ( p < 0.05) effects on the bolus dissolution time, respectively.

The reductions of hepcidin in the 15 dP, 18 dP, 21 dP, 1 dL, and 7 dL groups were extremely significant ( P < 0.01), while no significances were shown in the 14 dL and 21 dL groups.

Results showed that coniferous forests had the lowest species diversity (0.86), which exhibited extremely significant differences from broad-leaved forests (1.47, p < 0.01) and coniferous broad-leaved mixed forests (1.58, p < 0.01).

* Indicates a significant difference ( p < 0.05) between the control group and the 0.5 ppm thyme essential oil treatment group under the same storage time; ** indicates an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) between the control group and the 0.5 ppm thyme essential oil treatment group under the same storage time. 3.

The difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

Relative protein expression of mesenchymal markers Vimentin and α-SMA in the siESRP1 groups indicated great increases with extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).