In addition, Spearman’s rank-order correlation showed that the samples in different locations of the same habitat had extremely significant positive correlation ( p < 0.01).
← all phrases
“extremely significant”
In the literature
For the index of leakage rate, the horizontal transplanting operation speed and the length of feeding have a significant effect ( P < 0.05); Inclined transplanting operation speed have a significant influence (0.01 ≤ P ≤ 0.05) and the length of feeding have extremely significant influence ( P < 0.01).
tzumu populations were extremely significant correlation ( r = 0.58, p < 0.01, see Fig. 4 a).
And it is extremely significant at slow speeds ( p < 0.01); when the subjects are jogging, the high stride group and the low stride group show a significant difference in the relative support period ( p < 0.05), and the high stride frequency in the relative support period of the group was significantly shortened, but during the middle and fast running, the low-cadence group and the high-cadence group showed an increase in running frequency and a relative support period.
The significance level was set at p < 0.05, with extremely significant results defined as p < 0.01.
In all cases, p value <0.05 was considered statistically extremely significant, and p value <0.01 was considered statistically significant.
The comparison between the C and B Group, on the third day showed that the difference was extremely significant (t=5.32, P <0.01).
More attention was paid to the modules possessing extremely significant correlations with traits ( p < 0.01) to compute the association of GS, which represents the correlation between genes and traits, with MM representing the correlation of the module eigengene and the gene expression profile.
The differences between two groups of data for comparisons in all the experiments were evaluated as statistically significant ( ∗ p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( ∗∗ p < 0.01).
After the challenge, the grades of the inflammatory reaction were recorded each week, and there were extremely significant differences between the six test groups and three control groups from 2 wpi until the end of the experiment at 4 wpi ( p < 0.01; Table 1 ).
The reductions of hepcidin in the 15 dP, 18 dP, 21 dP, 1 dL, and 7 dL groups were extremely significant ( P < 0.01), while no significances were shown in the 14 dL and 21 dL groups.
As the FCR, ADFI and BW8 of higher RFI group were extremely significant higher ( P < 0.01) than the lower RFI group.
The paired t-test results showed that the subjective fatigue evaluation after the test was significantly higher than that before the test, and there were extremely significant differences in the subjective fatigue scores of the subjects in terms of eye symptoms, headache symptoms, and body pain ( p < 0.01), as shown in Table 1 .
Differences were considered significant at a P value <0.05 and extremely significant at values of P < 0.01 and P < 0.001.
Differences were considered statistically significant at a P value of <0.05 and extremely significant at a value of P <0.01 or P <0.001.
The significance of all the above test results was divided into two levels: “significant” (P<0.05, marked with “*” in charts) and “extremely significant” (P<0.01, marked with “**” in charts).
LS-HPC and starch were found to have extremely significant ( p < 0.01) and significant ( p < 0.05) effects on the bolus dissolution time, respectively.
It exhibited extremely significant difference to the control at the concentration more than 50 μg/ml ( p < .01).
Model 8 is a test of the positive effect of R&D internationalization on domestic technology alliances, and the promotion effect of R&D internationalization on domestic technology alliances is extremely significant ( β = 0.3603, p < 0.01).
Between the no ultrasound abnormality group and the ultrasound abnormality group, there was an extremely significant difference in the detection rate of an abnormal chromosomal karyotype ( P < 0.01) and of VOUS ( P < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in the detection rate of pCNV ( P > 0.05).
There were extremely significant differences among the temperature stress treatments ( p < 0.01).
The results showed that PPPm-1 had good anti-fatigue effects, which could significantly prolong the weight-bearing swimming time of mice ( P < 0.01), reduce the levels of blood lactate and serum urea nitrogen in mice after exercise fatigue, and increase the levels of liver glycogen and muscle glycogen in mice (most differences are extremely significant P < 0.01) ( Hao and Sha, 2024 ). 5 mg/mL PPPm-1 could significantly promote the contraction amplitude, contraction rate, and relaxation rate of frog gastrocnemius muscle, as well as the ACh content at the junction of frog sciatic nerve and gastrocnemius muscle ( P < 0.01), but had a significant inhibitory effect on the AChE activity at the junction of frog sciatic nerve and gastrocnemius muscle ( P < 0.01) ( Hao and Sha, 2024 ).
The difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).
R 2 values were much lower in the first ratoon crop than the second crop, and the scatterplots of the first crop were much more concentrated than in the second crop, but the correlation coefficient (r) was extremely significant (P<0.01) as shown in S1 Table .
* Indicates significantly different (p<0.05), ** indicates extremely significant difference (p<0.01).