“extremely significant”

The linear model was extremely significant ( P < 0.01), indicating that the ANOVA was reliable.

The t -test of the above mentioned three parameters shows an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) between the two groups.

In each cropping period the difference in each index to alfalfa was extremely significant under J, P treatment and J × P interactive treatment ( P < 0.01).

Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA, and differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

Divergence of the selected lines, although gradual, resulted in an extremely significant difference in LRFI compared to HRFI males and females for the selected RFI trait in G13 ( P < 0.01).

Temperature exhibited an extremely significant effect (F = 60.22, p < 0.01), while reaction time and water/castor oil ratio were not statistically significant within the investigated ranges, consistent with the range analysis.

Difference was considered statistically significant when P < 0.05, whereas less than 0.01 were considered extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

Differences were considered significant when p<0.05 and differences were considered extremely significant when p<0.01.

The differences of the 18 differentially expressed miRNAs all reached the extremely significant level (P<0.01) (Fig. 2 ).

At the phylum level, significant interannual differences were observed: Campilobacterota showed extremely significant differences among the 3 years (0.001 < p ≤ 0.01), while 9 other phyla (including: Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi) exhibited super-significant differences ( p ≤ 0.001) ( Figure 2A ).

These differences were statistically extremely significant (p<0.01).

In addition, Spearman’s rank-order correlation showed that the samples in different locations of the same habitat had extremely significant positive correlation ( p < 0.01).

For the index of leakage rate, the horizontal transplanting operation speed and the length of feeding have a significant effect ( P < 0.05); Inclined transplanting operation speed have a significant influence (0.01 ≤ P ≤ 0.05) and the length of feeding have extremely significant influence ( P < 0.01).

The paired t-test results showed that the subjective fatigue evaluation after the test was significantly higher than that before the test, and there were extremely significant differences in the subjective fatigue scores of the subjects in terms of eye symptoms, headache symptoms, and body pain ( p < 0.01), as shown in Table 1 .

Among the three groups, the M-G scored the highest, the CC-G scored the lowest, and the difference in most items was extremely significant ( p < 0.01) except IS, Hos, and PI ( p < 0.05).

tzumu populations were extremely significant correlation ( r = 0.58, p < 0.01, see Fig. 4 a).

[ 42 ] reported that N and P fertilizers had extremely significant ( P < 0.01) effects on the 100-seed weight of mung bean.

The comparison between the C and B Group, on the third day showed that the difference was extremely significant (t=5.32, P <0.01).

The reductions of hepcidin in the 15 dP, 18 dP, 21 dP, 1 dL, and 7 dL groups were extremely significant ( P < 0.01), while no significances were shown in the 14 dL and 21 dL groups.

There were extremely significant difference between the two groups ( p < 0.01 ) in Se level and the activity of SOD, GSH-Px and CAT; but significant difference ( p < 0.05 ) between the two groups in the concentration of MDA (see Additional file 1 ).

In the same column of data in the table, if the letters are the same, the difference is not significant ( p > 0.05); if the letters are completely different, the difference is significant; lowercase letters indicate a significant level ( p < 0.05); uppercase letters indicate an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01).

More attention was paid to the modules possessing extremely significant correlations with traits ( p < 0.01) to compute the association of GS, which represents the correlation between genes and traits, with MM representing the correlation of the module eigengene and the gene expression profile.

LS-HPC and starch were found to have extremely significant ( p < 0.01) and significant ( p < 0.05) effects on the bolus dissolution time, respectively.

There were extremely significant differences among the temperature stress treatments ( p < 0.01).

Relative protein expression of mesenchymal markers Vimentin and α-SMA in the siESRP1 groups indicated great increases with extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).