extremely significantqualified
Therefore, the study of biomarkers for expeditious diagnosis and treatment, including age or sex factors, is extremely significant.
Therefore, the study of biomarkers for expeditious diagnosis and treatment, including age or sex factors, is extremely significant.
In this study, correlation analysis was performed on 14 indices, and multiple sets of significant or extremely significant correlations were identified, reflecting the results reported by Ning et al. that there is a correlation between polyphenols and flavonoids [ 60 ].
The latter, is an extremely significant effect because, by limiting the “anterior wall” of the upper incisors, may facilitate and enhance the mandibular anterior displacement.
In order to further analyze the significance of GRP78 and miR-495-3p in HF-HD combined with systemic HP therapy, we analyzed the significant predictive value of their levels on clinical efficacy after 12 weeks of treatment by ROC curve and found that both had extremely significant effects.
For the purpose of getting a better treatment, it is extremely significant to identify the effective ingredients and find out their best ratios in consideration of synergism and antagonism [ 14 ].
Significant differences were defined as P < 0.05, while P < 0.01 indicates extremely significant difference.
The levels of ABI4 and ABF2 in transgenic Arabidopsis were higher than those in WT, and the expression levels of ABI4 and ABF2 were extremely significant.
p < .05 was considered statistically significant, and p < .01 represented extremely significant. 3.
P < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant; P < 0.01 were considered to be extremely significant.
Values of p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 were considered statistically significant differences and extremely significant differences separately.
If P < 0.01, the difference is extremely significant.
The polynomial equations fitted by soil samples 2, 7, 10, and 11 had extremely significant correlations, while that of the other samples had significant correlations.
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 was very significant, and P < 0.001 was extremely significant.
Multivariate analysis of variance revealed an extremely significant main effect of time ( F = 1496.4, p = 5.691 × 10 −30 < 0.001, Greenhouse–Geisser corrected).
The two-way ANOVA indicated that both concentration-time and their interaction effect are extremely significant (p ˂ 0.0001) to the disruption of the preformed biofilm.
For example, a recent study that found an extremely significant association with schizophrenia used SNPs and not HLA types, and the index SNP that fell within the HLA region was not inside a known HLA gene, which may suggest a different mechanism underlying this association [ 42 ].
The results revealed that in completing tasks with different difficulty levels, no significant difference was observed in the performance at the preparation stage ( F = 0.30, P = 0.74 > 0.05), but extremely significant differences were noted in the takeoff ( F = 41.76, P = 0.00 < 0.01) and landing stages ( F = 74.87, P = 0.00 < 0.01).
The genera with significant or extremely significant differences in richness among the groups were Alternaria , Mortierella , Cryptococcus , Apodus , Epicoccum , Scytalidium and Chaetomium .
P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 were considered as significant and extremely significant, respectively.
Our findings may be extremely significant for preventing diseases and improving health, furthermore, reducing people’s financial burden on healthcare and improving the life quality.
The statistically significant differences are presented as follows: ns p > 0.05 (not significant), * p < 0.05 (significant), ** p < 0.01 (very significant), *** or **** p < 0.001 or 0.0001 (extremely significant).
Abstract Oncofertility is an extremely significant topic that is increasingly being discussed owing to increased evidence indicating that fertility preservation does not affect the treatment outcomes of patients with cancer but significantly contributes to preserving life quality.
andiyazi exhibited an extremely significant and positive correlation with two FUB genes.
P < 0.05 indicated significant difference, and P < 0.01 indicated extremely significant difference.
P < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference, while P < 0.01 was considered to indicate extremely significant differences.