“extremely significant”

p < 0.05 means significant, p < 0.01 means extremely significant.

As in other previous works on VIT [ 37 , 38 , 39 ], basophil activation decreased throughout treatment, with the differences being extremely significant at T3 when the differences with TG were diluted, becoming virtually identical.

ANOVA was employed to assess significance with P values less than 0.05 (*, significant), 0.01 (**, very significant) and 0.001 (***, extremely significant). 1.8 Ethics statement All experiments carried out in vivo in this study were in compliance with the recommendations in the Animal Management Rules of the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China (Document No. 55, 2001) and approved by the Ethics Committee of Fudan University. 1.9 Experiment caveats The following should be advised as the caveats to the experiments in this study: The presence of lysostaphin in the tissue of the in vivo drug release experiments was not tested.

The differences at p < 0.05 were considered significant, and p < 0.01 were extremely significant.

P < 0.05 was considered as extremely significant.

A 2 + 0.60 × B 2 − 0.12 × C 2 (1) It can be seen from Table 2 that the p -value (0.0389) for the breaking strength regression model was less than 0.05, indicating that the model was significant (a p -value less than 0.05 indicates a significant difference, and a p -value less than 0.01 indicates an extremely significant difference) [ 29 ].

The PRL also reached an extremely significant level on Day 5 and Day 6 under drought conditions.

P <0.05 indicated statistically significant difference, while P <0.01 indicated extremely significant difference.

All data are presented as the mean ± standard error (SEM), and differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05 and extremely significant when p < 0.01. 3.

Both amino acids and polyphenols had a high genetic diversity, and multiple groups of significant or extremely significant correlations.

According to the results of the analysis of variance table ( Table S3 ), we found that the effect of ultrasonic power on essential oils extracted from SS was extremely significant but the effects of the other factors were not significant.

Consequently, 16 positive transgenic lines were obtained, in which 7 lines showed an extremely significant increase in the expression level of OsPPO1 compared with the control ZH11 ( Figure S6 ).

p<0.05 was considered statistically significant, while p<0.01 was considered extremely significant difference.

Comparisons between groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05, and an extremely significant difference was defined as p < 0.01. 3.

Results were considered significant at the level of p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01. 3.

The ability of BMI to predict hypertension risk was superior than predicting elevated BP risk, and this difference was extremely significant among girls.

p < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, while p < 0.01 (**) was considered extremely significant. 3.

The statistical results indicated that there were extremely significant differences for m 2 G, G m , C m , and m 1 G between healthy controls and uveitis patients.

A value of p > 0.05 was considered no significant difference, p < 0.05 was statistically significant, and p < 0.01 was considered an extremely significant difference. 3.

Several pairwise comparisons showed extremely significant differences between models ( Table 2 ).

ANOVA of regression equation coefficients showed that the effect of ultrasonic time, the solid:liquid ratio on quinoa protein extraction rate, the interaction terms AB, and the interaction terms BC, were extremely significant; the effect of ultrasonic temperature on the quinoa protein extraction rate and the interaction terms AC was insignificant.

Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and values of P < 0.01 were considered extremely significant. 3.

The P 1 value of Sunken Tongue is 0.000, which shows that it has an extremely significant statistical difference between points.

Statistical analysis was carried out by one-way ANOVA test to analyze differences between the controls and treated where p<0.05 is considered significant and p < 0.01 extremely significant. 3.

In our study, we found that most bacteria, such as Gemmatimonadaceae , RB41 , Rokubacteriales , Gaiella , Vicinamibacteraceae , Rubrobacter , and JG30-KF-CM45 , demonstrated an extremely significant positive correlation with pH, whereas Vicinamibacteraceae , RB41 , Gemmatimonadaceae , and Rubrobacter were significantly negative correlated with SOC.