“extremely significant”

Expression was extremely significant in the distal colon of the double infection group ( p < 0.0001).

Differences considered significant when p < 0.05 (*), very significant when p < 0.01 (**), highly significant when p < 0.001 (***), and extremely significant when p < 0.0001 (****).

Females were 4.8 times more likely to experience neuropsychiatric symptoms than males, and the association was extremely significant (OR=4.851, 95% CI: 3.085–7.626, P <0.0001).

Results There was an extremely significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in body weight (108.62 kg→ 94.48 kg), body mass index (36.46 kg/m 2 →31.76 kg/m 2 ), systolic blood pressure (125.71 mmHg→109.05 mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (84.52 mmHg→ 75.24 mmHg), total cholesterol (208.24 mg/dl→186.62 mg/dl), triacylglicerols (218.67 mg/dl→113.90 mg/dl) and glucose (109.81 mg/dl→ 93.33 mg/dl).

Thirteen items with a high frequency of appearance and large change due to intervention were extracted, and these have an extremely significant correlation (r = 0.96, p < 0.0001) with the DBD.

An extremely significant difference in OS was detected between the two groups ( P < 0.0001, Figure 4F ).

A considerable elevation in the expression levels of all assessed markers—TNF-alpha, IL-1β, c-Fos, BDNF, Nfl, and GFP—was noted in the ISO-induced group, exhibiting extremely significant differences relative to the control group ( p < 0.0001).

* p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; ** p value < 0.01 was considered statistically very significant; *** p value < 0.001 was considered statistically extremely significant, and **** p value < 0.0001 was considered statistically highly extremely significant.

Using the permutation-based recombination breakpoint-clustering test employed in [63] , we detected an extremely significant association (p<0.0001) between breakpoint positions and the locations of the primer binding sites used to sequence these genomes.

Further, on days 7 and 14, the membrane group showed an extremely significant reduction compared to values in respective control groups (p < 0.0001).

These findings were statistically extremely significant between the M and N groups: pathological skeletal PSMA volume: p < 0.0001, pathologic skeletal NaF volume: p < 0.000021, and pathological contemporaneous PSMA & NaF volume: p < 0.00002, respectively ( Table 2 ).

Moreover, the observed extremely significant difference (p = 0.0001) showed the gap between generations and the decline of indigenous knowledge on medicinal plants down generations.

Furthermore, after 30 min of histone treatment, we revealed a significantly different MDW compared to respective controls ( p = 0.0012), whereas histone + LPS showed an extremely significant difference vs control ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1 B).

The difference was extremely significant ( P = 0.0001) [ Table 2 ].

A two-way ANOVA analysis shows that the variable % of AcEt/TFA is extremely significant, affecting 95.13% of total result variance, with a p -value < 0.0001.

According to GraphPad Prism 7 software, * a p -value 0.01–0.05 was considered statistically significant, ** a p -value 0.001–0.01 very significant and *** a p -value 0.0001–0.001 extremely significant, while **** a p -value < 0.0001 was very extremely significant. 3.

**** indicates extremely significant difference between groups ( p < 0.0001).

Statistical significance levels are categorized as follows: extremely significant (****, p < 0.0001), extremely significant (***, p = 0.0001 to 0.001), very significant (**, p = 0.001 to 0.01), significant (*, p = 0.01 to 0.05), and not significant (ns, p ≥ 0.05). 3.

Statistical significance was defined as non-significant ( ns P -value >0.05), significant (* P -value ≤0.05), very significant (** P -value ≤0.01), highly significant (*** P -value ≤0.001), and extremely significant (**** P -value ≤0.0001).

Moreover, Hotwani et al., 2021 revealed that 3 weeks of combining plyometric with sprint training sessions resulted in an extremely significant ( p < 0.0001) gain in agility (Illinois test and T-test).

These differences are extremely significant ( P < 0.0001 in both cases, Fisher’s exact test) and strongly suggest that the presence of NRSF/REST, but not SF-1, consensus sequences is preferentially required for interaction of SF-1 with the genomic-binding sites that it shares with NRSF/REST in H295R cells.

The KMO was 0.91, while Bartlett’s test for sphericity yielded extremely significant results (χ 2 = 13,958.572; p < 0.0001).

Results were considered as not significant (ns) when P > 0.05, significant when 0.01 < P < 0.05 (*), more significant when 0.001 < P < 0.025 (**), very significant when P < 0.001 (***), or extremely significant when P < 0.0001 (****).

P values are calculated using unpaired t tests with Welch’s correction, and the levels of statistical significance are assigned as follows: P ≥ 0.05, not significant (n.s.); 0.01 ≤ P < 0.05, significant (*); 0.001≤ P < 0.01, very significant (**); P 0.0001 ≤ P < 0.001, extremely significant (***); P < 0.0001, extremely significant (****).

Though there was a statistically significant difference among groups, the difference between Revo-S and WaveOne was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).