“extremely significant”

As displayed in Figure 9(c) , the plotted KM curve illustrated extremely significant differences ( P < 0.0001), of these, 269 and 270 samples were classified into the high- and low-risk groupings, respectively. 3.8.

Here, all of this is supported by an extremely significant McNemar’s test (χ 2 = 47.3, p < 0.0001).

The infection rates of different species of parasites showed extremely significant differences ( p = 0.0001).

The picking-rate model was extremely significant (P < 0.0001), and the quadratic term of factor C (C2) had the most significant effect (F = 71.25).

It is a nonparametric test that compares two unpaired sets of data significantly different when the p value is less than 0.05 (**** extremely significant P < 0.0001, *** extremely significant 0.0001 < P < 0.001, ** very significant 0.001 < P < 0.01, * significant 0.0.1 < P < 0.05 and ns not significant ≥ 0.05).

From 6 DPI and beyond, P values were extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).

clareFontShape{T1}{linotext}{m}{n} {linotext }{} \DeclareSymbolFont{linotext}{T1}{linotext}{m}{n} \DeclareSymbolFontAlphabet{\mathLINOTEXT}{linotext} \begin{document}$$EE = 64.95 + 24.52*A - 5.70*B + 3.55*AB$$\end{document} The differences between the various treatments of the EE and LC models were extremely significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating that the residuals were entirely the product of random errors, even though the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05).

Correlation between self-reported evaluation score and a computed symptoms score A moderate correlation was found between the self-reported evaluation score (on a scale 0-10) and a computed symptoms score (by adding up all the symptoms a patient presents), by using Spearman's rho (0.584), which was extremely significant (P<0.0001), indicating an accurate correlation between the patients' estimate of disease severity and the number of symptoms ( Fig. 4 ).

In particular, compared with the level observed at 0 d, the expression of BfmRS (eightfold), lepB (eightfold) and esp (17-fold) reached extremely significant levels at 5 days ( t = 10.64, df = 8, p = 0.0001), 3 days ( t = 25.63, df = 8, p < 0.0001) and 7 days ( t = 5.120, df = 8, p = 0.0009), respectively.

In particular, when WF was used as source of survival and growth stimuli the difference was extremely significant (CTR vs KR, in WF p < 0.0001).

Statistical analysis was conducted, where the production levels of investigated phenolic compounds in rol A transgenic plants exhibited an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.0001) when compared to the wild type A. carvifolia plants ( Table 2 ). 3.5.

The distance between channels have extremely significant difference between white-red (p = 0.0001), highly significant between blue-green (p = 0.0127), blue-red (p = 0.002), green-red (p = 0.0014) but no significant difference comparing white-blue (p = 0.15), white-green (0.14).

Though there was a statistically significant difference among groups, the difference between Revo-S and WaveOne was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).

Statistical significance was defined as significant (* p -value ≤ 0.05), very significant (** p -value ≤ 0.01), highly significant (*** p -value ≤ 0.001) and extremely significant (**** p -value ≤ 0.0001). 5.

The IC50 value of Caki-1 cells was calculated as 408.2 nM using GraphPad Prism, and the inhibitory effect of the ester toadstools on the activity of Caki-1 cells was extremely significant ( p < 0.0001) at a concentration of 200 nmol/L ( Figure 13 ). 3.8.

Statistical analysis of the pre- and post-test results of the linear regression of the pennation angle and fascicle length showed an extremely significant difference between the slopes (ANCOVA p < 0.0001; d = 0.80 and p < 0.001; d = 0.47, respectively). 3.3.

Using the permutation-based recombination breakpoint-clustering test employed in [63] , we detected an extremely significant association (p<0.0001) between breakpoint positions and the locations of the primer binding sites used to sequence these genomes.

A Student t-test showed extremely significant differences between both surfaces ( p < 0.0001; see Figure 7 B), which allows us to conclude that Tz-BSA-coated plates combined with modified-TCO capture antibody greatly improve the ELISA sensitivity. 4.

The results obtained by the spectrophotometer reading at a wavelength of 488 nm were extremely significant: FPP ® induced a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.0001) in the blood ROS levels, directly related to the size of the tumor ( Figure 5 ).

The mathematical models of Pb 2+ and Cd 2+ were extremely significant (p < 0.0001), and the determination coefficients were 0.9952 and 0.9887, respectively, indicating that these two models can explain of the change of response values, and provided a perfect fit of response surface.

Another t -test was conducted for the average PDI values between the 2 μm/30 nm compared to PEG, which showed an extremely significant value ( p ≤ 0.0001).

An unpaired t test (for two-groups comparison) and ANOVA test (for multi-group comparison) were used in statistical analysis ( ∗ , p < 0.05, significant; ∗∗ , p < 0.01, very significant; ∗∗∗ , p < 0.001, highly significant; ∗∗∗∗ , p < 0.0001, extremely significant; ns, p > 0.05, not significant).

Nevertheless, the enhanced resilience of CoQ10-supplemented membranes was still extremely significant at this higher temperature (15% CL vs. 15% CL-CoQ10, p < 0.0001).

Such increases became highly significant in P20 cells ( p < 0.001) and extremely significant and peaked in value in cells at P25 and P30 ( p < 0.0001) when compared to those for P5 cells.

In this test, it was observed that treatment had an extremely significant effect on the ability of the mice to recognize the novel object ( p <0.0001).