“extremely significant”

It can be seen from Table A3 that the quadratic polynomial fit model is extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).

Data Analysis The statistical significance of correlation analyses was assessed using linear correlation tests: not significant (N.S., p > 0.05), significant (*: 0.01 ≤ p ≤ 0.001), very significant (**: 0.001 ≤ p < 0.0001), extremely significant (***: p ≤ 0.0001).

Correlation between self-reported evaluation score and a computed symptoms score A moderate correlation was found between the self-reported evaluation score (on a scale 0-10) and a computed symptoms score (by adding up all the symptoms a patient presents), by using Spearman's rho (0.584), which was extremely significant (P<0.0001), indicating an accurate correlation between the patients' estimate of disease severity and the number of symptoms ( Fig. 4 ).

Equation (5) was extremely significant ( p < 0.0001) and the model was ideal ( F = 29.86).

5E ), survival curves for the WT and Δ BbOle1 mutant strains were extremely significant ( P < 0.0001), and the LT 50 values for these two strains were 6 and 8 days, respectively.

In group A, effect of trial drug Trivritta powder along with Aragvadha Patra Lepa on subjective parameters showed that there was a statistically extremely significant ( P < 0.0001) improvement in itching, oozing, and eruption.

The pretest vs post test values of the WOMAC scale for patients with knee OA within both groups were found to be extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).

Additionally, m6A-RLRS was extremely significant for male patients with HCC ( P < 0.0001), but it had no significance for female patients ( P = 0.47) (Fig. 5 K and L).

If hatch rates were compared between 23 weeks of conventional storage and 22 weeks (5 months) of water storage, differences were extremely significant for both species: 0.1 ± 0.1 versus 84.9 ± 9.8 %, respectively, for Ae. albopictus ( T test, t = 14.9589, df = 4, P < 0.0001) and 3.7 ± 1.2 versus 84.3 ± 4.0 %, respectively, for Ae. aegypti ( T test, t = 33.6313, df = 4, P < 0.0001).

Here, all of this is supported by an extremely significant McNemar’s test (χ 2 = 47.3, p < 0.0001).

Degrees of significance were assessed by three different rating values: * p < 0.05 (significant), ** p < 0.01 (highly significant), *** p < 0.001 (extremely significant), and **** p ≤ 0.0001 (extremely significant), or non-significant ( p > 0.05). 5.

Time to egress statistics were calculated for the RAP-treated parasites (mean 10.5 min, SD 5.6 min) and for the control parasites (mean 18.8 min, SD 3.2 min), with a two-tailed unpaired t -test revealing the difference to be extremely significant (t = 7.2297, d.f. = 77, p <0.0001).

This difference was considered extremely significant (U = 3; U′ = 172, p value < 0.0001). 3.3.

Significance values are denoted by asterisks as defined by GraphPad Prism version 6.04: ****extremely significant (p < 0.0001); ***extremely significant (0.001 ≤ p ≤ 0.0001); **very significant (0.01 ≤ p ≤ 0.001); *significant (0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.01).

As shown in TABLE 3 , the model difference was extremely significant ( p ‐value < .0001), and the Lack of Fit was not significant ( p ‐value = .1139 > .05).

The correlation coefficient ( r ) in all tests between the two methods was statistically extremely significant at P <0.0001.

Two-way ANOVA Sidak’s multiple comparisons test was used to compare the mean of three values obtained from three independent conditions, using GraphPad Prism version 7 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, U.S.); * p < 0.05 indicates a significant result; ** p < 0.01 a very significant result, *** p < 0.001 a highly significant result; and **** p < 0.0001 an extremely significant result. 3.

The distance between channels have extremely significant difference between white-red (p = 0.0001), highly significant between blue-green (p = 0.0127), blue-red (p = 0.002), green-red (p = 0.0014) but no significant difference comparing white-blue (p = 0.15), white-green (0.14).

The analysis between the groups showed that during all time periods, the ML group showed a significant reduction on the 7 (p=0.0056) and 14 (p=0.0018) days and an extremely significant reduction in 21 days (p<0.0001), when compared to the isolated L group ( Fig. 3A ).

As shown in Figure 2 A and summarized in Table S1 , the type of LAB fermentation had an extremely significant and substantial impact on the soluble sugar content of the QJ beverage ( p < 0.0001), decreasing from 28.75 ± 0.12 to 26.11 ± 0.80, 21.61 ± 1.25, and 22.13 ± 1.32 mg/mL by the fermentation using the Lf14, Lr18 and Lp808 strains, respectively.

By day 16 all conditions were all extremely significant for 1205LuC NTP (38.3% of total volume), TPZ (32.5% of total volume), and NTP+TPZ (10.8% of total volume), all at ( p < 0.0001).

As displayed in Figure 9(c) , the plotted KM curve illustrated extremely significant differences ( P < 0.0001), of these, 269 and 270 samples were classified into the high- and low-risk groupings, respectively. 3.8.

Post-facto calculation for this restricted TIR (rTIR), revealed extremely significant differences between the groups and across days (Two-way ANOVA, main effect, cohort: p < 0.0001; main effect, day: p < 0.0001, interaction cohort × day: p < 0.00001, Supplementary Fig.

The addition of peppermint essential oil as a penetration promoter was confirmed to be statistically extremely significant ( p < 0.0001) in most cases (HPMC, MC, HEC, NaCMC, and HPC).

There was an extremely significant ( p < 0.0001) reduction in body weight, body mass index, systolic BP, diastolic BP, total cholesterol, triacylglycerols and glucose (109.81 mg/dL → 93.33 mg/dL).