“did not reach statistical significance”

Target contrast did not reach statistical significance at p < 0.05, p -value for this contrast between 225 and 250 ms was 0.09 and its topography was strikingly similar to the Color vs.

The experimental group decreased by 3.9 drinks per week compared to 0.4 drinks per week in the control group, but this did not reach statistical significance (effect size=0.26; beta=−0.12, 95% CI −7.96 to 0.03, P =.05).

We found mild repression of luciferase activity by individual miRNAs, which did not reach statistical significance, whereas the transfection with all three miRNAs resulted in approximately a 60% decrease in activity, suggesting that they act cooperatively ( P <0.05, n =3) ( Figure 2a ).

The myogenic index was reduced by ∼18%, although this effect did not reach statistical significance at the p < 0.05 level ( Figure 1 D).

Although the difference between the two groups did not reach statistical significance (P=0.05), it still reveals a noticeable tendency: statin use is more prevalent among the population of patients with T2DM and lower limb atherosclerosis.

Patients with a preoperative sensory deficit tended to more frequently develop a new postoperative sensory deficit, but this did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.05; Table 2 ).

In addition, interactions with treatment-by-time and treatment-by-time squared did not reach statistical significance at P < 0.05.

Although there was a trend suggestive of a modest cold anti-hypersensitivity at 2 h following the FN1040 injections, the difference did not reach statistical significance ( p < 0.05 compared with saline).

Main effects of “load” [ F (2, 78) = 1.28, p = 0.283], “gender” [ F (1, 39) = 1.83, p = 0.184] and “education” [ F (1, 39) = 1.29, p = 0.263] as well as the interaction effects “load” × “age” [ F (2, 78) = 1.51, p = 0.227], “load” × “gender” [ F (2, 78) = 2.18, p = 0.120] and “load” × “education” [ F (2, 78) = 0.78, p = 0.461] did not reach statistical significance at p < 0.05.

Although, repeated measure ANOVAs did not reach statistical significance, area under the curve (AUC) of insulin secretion per islet was increased in HF islets ( p <0.05).

However, when HHV6 was analyzed as a time-dependent covariate on multivariate analysis, the association did not reach statistical significance (HR 2.29, 95% CI 0.99-5.27; p=0.05).

Negative sensory descriptors such as musty or earthy odor and taste were minimally perceived and did not reach statistical significance (p < 0.05).

A difference in femoral neck BMD between nondiabetics and individuals with T2D approached but did not reach statistical significance (MD = −0.14, 95% CI [−0.27, 0.00], Z = 1.94, P = .05).

For EPA + DHA intake, the association approached but did not reach statistical significance for all-cause mortality ( P = 0.055), while showing a borderline significant trend for cardiovascular mortality ( P = 0.050), as depicted in Fig.

However, unlike in the β-arrestin-2 interaction assay where the effect of these mutants did not reach statistical significance, in the Ca 2+ assay both N215A 5.46 ( p < 0.05) and T119A 3.33 ( p < 0.001) produced significant reductions in potency for GW9508 compared with wild type FFA4.

Similar to the trap collections, human landing collections in the village were higher than in the plantation, though this difference did not reach statistical significance (F-value = 2.16, p = 0.05).

GS and dose were the most predictive factors in multivariate analysis but did not reach statistical significance at the p < 0.05 level.

Knock-down of PSMD9 significantly sensitized both cell lines to all doses of radiation (p < 0.05; except MCF7 cells at 4 Gy and MDA-MB-231 at 8 Gy, which did not reach statistical significance).

Notably, while the median PGR showed a decreasing trend from the CNAG group (7.8) to the CAG group (7.0), this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p > 0.05, Table 1 ).

The interaction term did not reach statistical significance (p-value < 0.05) for any of the subgroups.

Although the difference in high-risk sexual behavior between people with zero psychosocial problems versus one psychosocial problem did not reach statistical significance, all other differences were statistically significant ( p < .05).

Interestingly, a trend was also seen for controls, but this did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.050).

18.5 ± 8.3), although this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.05).

Despite the higher hazard ratios, they did not reach statistical significance (p < 0.05).

FDR adjusted p-values did not reach statistical significance, and a cut-off of p-value < 0.05 and |logFC| > 0.5 were used.