Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

When depression severity was categorized as no depression, mild, moderate, and severe, a trend toward an increased incidence of stroke in the moderate and severe depression groups was observed; however, this trend did not reach statistical significance (p=0.04) ( Table 1 ).
Twenty‐two percent of calcium supplement users reported a history of prior bone fracture, whereas 16% of nonusers reported prior bone fracture, but the difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.04).
Subgroup analysis stratified by treatment regimen revealed that the same cutoff value predicted a trend toward longer survival in patients receiving combination therapy; however, the results did not reach statistical significance for OS (PFS: p = 0.04, OS: p = 0.06).
Although the lower prevalence of CR in the low-probability group compared with the intermediate- and high-probability groups did not reach statistical significance, the differences in CSFR between CDST response groups were statistically significant ( p = 0.04; Figure 2 ).
Compliance rates regarding vegetable intake were higher in the simultaneous group than in the control condition ( P =.07) although this did not reach statistical significance; and respondents in the sequential condition reported smoking more cigarettes than respondents in the control condition ( P =.04).
While the specific toothbrushing time categories did not reach statistical significance among children aged 6–8 years, the overall timing of brushing showed a significant relationship with lower caries prevalence ( p = 0.04), indicating a possible cumulative effect across all examined categories.
Three studies assessed changes in femoral neck BMD, and the random-effects model showed an increasing trend (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI: −0.01–0.49), but this did not reach statistical significance, with moderate heterogeneity (I 2 = 70%, p = 0.04).
While this difference, and the presence of t(14;16) and deletion (17p), did not reach statistical significance, a higher number of patients in the early progression cohort had t(4:14) (21% vs. 8.9 %; P =0.04).