Without FWC, the association between FA and RC did not reach statistical significance after FDR correction for 18 tests ( P = 0.017, uncorrected).
← all phrases
“did not reach statistical significance”
In the literature
Analysis on matched PRFs showed that patients perceived that they discussed other PD-related conditions less frequently than physicians perceived although this difference did not reach statistical significance (matched patients vs matched PRFs, P =0.017).
Although the overall and pairwise comparisons among 4 study arms did not reach statistical significance (due to the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison; p ≤0.017 was considered statistically significant in the pairwise comparision), the diet+exercise group reduced depression (Δ Diet+Exercise = -1.7 points, p = 0.03; vs. control Δ Control = 0.7 points) and increased social support (Δ Diet+Exercise = 1.0 points, p = 0.05; vs. control Δ Control = -2.8 points).
No effect of age or BMI on MTV was observed in the current study, however we did observe a modest effect of gender, although this did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.017) [ 20 ].
Compared to sWAC, these genes were seen induced in prWAC although the increased expression level of Z1C1 did not reach statistical significance (prWAC vs sWAC: p = 0.017 for UCP1; p = 0.018 for PRDM16; and p = 0.33 for Z1C1) ( Fig. 4A ).
While the difference did not reach statistical significance after Bonferroni correction, a marginal trend towards better survival was observed in the CTD-UIP group compared to the asbestosis-UIP group ( p = 0.017).
When severe GBA variant carriers were compared to mild GBA carriers and noncarriers, a possible association was demonstrated, as the Breslow test was statistically significant and the Tarone-Ware test was at near statistical significance, while the log-rank test did not reach statistical significance ( figure ; Breslow p = 0.017, Tarone-Ware p = 0.051, log-rank p = 0.24).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0174
OS and PFS did not reach statistical significance according to pre-specified criteria (p = 0.0174 for OS and p = 0.0020 for PFS).
did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.0175
The differences did not reach statistical significance among these factors, except for age ( P = 0.0175).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0175
Although the zinc-mediated reduction in overall interstitial collagen area fraction (Masson’s trichrome) in the DM + ZnSO 4 group did not reach statistical significance, zinc treatment significantly suppressed the pathological Collagen I accumulation ( p = 0.0175) and Caspase-3-mediated apoptosis ( p = 0.0051).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0175
When analyzing the two bands separately, the lower Glt-1 band also showed a significant decrease in the LRRK2 G2019S mice, while levels of the higher band did not reach statistical significance (Supplementary Fig. 1m, online resource- LRRK2 WT vs LRRK2 G2019S; p = 0.0175; Supplementary Fig. 1n, online resource- LRRK2 WT vs LRRK2 G2019S; p = 0.07).
While a similar trend was seen when using the continuous exposure measure, the difference did not reach statistical significance (Table 3 , p = 0.018 with threshold of 0.017 after Bonferroni’s adjustment).
Regression analysis of the male subgroup only also showed a high correlation between the HSI score and the SLC6A3 VNTR and CYP2A6 genotypes, although this did not reach statistical significance (AIC value: 70.761; P = 0.018).
Mean PEG3 expression was lower in PatMS mice although this did not reach statistical significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons ( t = 2.690, P =0.018) ( Figure 2 D).
Although the comparison between RMGIC and Type IX GIC showed a large effect size (r = 0.53), it did not reach statistical significance after correcting for multiple comparisons (p = 0.018).
At necropsy excised control primary tumours were significantly smaller than Fra-2 cl 1 tumours, whereas the difference to cl 2 tumours did not reach statistical significance (control mean tumour weight = 0.67 g, Fra-2 cl 1 mean tumour weight = 1.63 g, Fra-2 cl 2 mean tumour weight = 0.87 g; control vs Fra-2 cl 1 p = 0.018; control vs Fra-2 cl 2 p = 0.513) (Fig. 1 b).
Displacement and infiltration of the WM tract were detected in higher percentage of high-grade gliomas compared to low-grade tumors, though the difference did not reach statistical significance except in infiltration pattern ( p = 0.018).
At 6 months after CA, both higher W/H ratio and BF% groups showed relatively larger LA size compared with their counterparts, but it did not reach statistical significance in BF% groups (W/H ratio: 34.2 ± 11.1 ml/m 2 vs 29.4 ± 8.7 ml/m 2 , P = 0.018, and BF%: 34.9 ± 10.8 ml/m 2 vs 30.8 ± 10.2 ml/m 2 , P = 0.060).
did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.0189
Although it did not reach statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons, rs6473797 showed nominally significant association ( P = 0.0189) with ADS.
However, this trend did not reach statistical significance at the interim analysis ( p = 0.019).
The number of IL-5 spots tended to be higher in the QS21-Liposomes group as compared to the SWE-group, but this did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.019, MW test).
The within-group analysis revealed statistically significant improvements in all outcome variables for both groups at post-treatment, one-month follow-up, and three-month follow-up, except for the PPT of the right trapezius in the control group at post-treatment, which did not reach statistical significance (MD = 0.8; p = 0.019) ( Table 3 ).
Abnormal HADS‐anxiety scores at both baseline and 12 months were more likely in those with moderate to severe IBS symptoms at both baseline and 12‐month follow‐up (147 (46.2%) of 318 individuals), although this did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.019 for trend) (Figure 2 ). 3.2.
Trends for the “Post” cohort to have higher proportions flagged at medium-risk ( p = 0.27) or high-risk ( p = 0.23) of thromboembolism did not reach statistical significance, though a higher proportion of the “Post” cohort were flagged with “suspected” thromboembolism compared to the “Pre” cohort ( p = 0.019, Fig. 3 A–C).
The difference between the left and right ROIs did not reach statistical significance, t (18) = 2.57, p = 0.019, d rm = 0.62, 95% CI [0.15, 1.53].