Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

A positive trend in daytime functioning was observed upon chamomile consumption, though it did not reach statistical significance. 142 By contrast, 2 methodologically identical studies in 77 elderly hospitalized individuals with a mean age of 74.3 ± 10.6 years, 143 and 110 postmenopausal women aged 50-60 years, 144 found that 400 mg of chamomile extract twice a day for 4 weeks significantly improved PSQI sleep scores following treatment (from 8.8 ± 4.3 to 5.0 ± 3.7, P < .001, and from 13.68 ± 1.68 to 9.07 ± 1.53, P = .001, respectively) compared to placebo.
Specifically, the odds of macrosomia were markedly elevated among women with early menarche, declined to the lowest level at the reference age, and then showed a positive trend of increasing risk with AAM values greater than 15 years, although this association did not reach statistical significance at the individual later age points.
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0611.2× alphaplainly factual
After propensity score matching, the association was attenuated and did not reach statistical significance (β = 0.26 [95% CI, −0.01–0.52]; p = 0.061), although a numerical trend toward longer procedural duration in the GA group persisted.
As an exploratory analysis, we examined the relationship between tumorous CA9 mRNA expression and circulating CA9 levels in 32 HCC specimens and observed a positive trend that did not reach statistical significance when assessed by Spearman’s rank correlation ( online supplemental figure 8 , online supplemental table 15 ).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0551.1× alphaplainly factual
Similarly, the percentage of peripheral blood blasts showed a trend toward reduction, with a median of 19.5% (7.0–24.0) in TP53 -mutated AML versus 21.0% (16.0–26.0) in non-mutated AML, although the difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.055) (see Supplementary Fig. 1 ).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.08181.6× alphaplainly factual
In the HCF model, serum total cholesterol and triglyceride levels showed a decreasing trend in the FV-HCF group compared to the MASH-HCF group, however, the differences did not reach statistical significance ( Fig. 2A and 2B ) ( p = 0.0818 for serum total cholesterol level and p = 0.2593 for serum triglyceride level).
did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.0671.3× alphaplainly factual
Regarding age, using the 50–59 age group as the reference, the 30–39 age group had a significantly higher GHQ-12 score (IRR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.05–4.56, P = 0.037); the < 30 age group also showed a trend toward higher scores, though it did not reach statistical significance (IRR = 2.15, 95% CI: 0.95–4.85, P = 0.067).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0521.0× alphaplainly factual
In contrast, patients with PE exhibited significantly higher methylation levels in T compared with D tissues ( p = 0.035), while A tissues showed a trend toward higher methylation compared with D tissues, although this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.052).