“close to significance”

On a level close to significance, more participants from the intervention group experienced a decrease (a positive change) in the concentration of total cholesterol after 8 weeks of the intervention compared to the participants from the control group ( p = 0.100).

Comparisons with the different groups showed values close to significance for HLA-A*24, -A*34, -B*07, -B*15, -B*38, -B*44, -C*03, and -DRB1*11 alleles.

We found increased serum PLP levels close to significance in patients with fractures.

The increase in Sprint 8 (87: -8 to 182 W; p = 0.06) and time to exhaustion (208: -24 to 439 s; p = 0.06) were close to significance.

We also found that the fitted mean sample sizes for rare disease trials do differ slightly between prevalence classes (the interaction between prevalence and phase was close to significance) with slightly larger trials conducted in diseases with higher prevalence.

Results showed that in 4-years-old children good performances in false belief tasks were significantly correlated with the tendency to delay to share in the choice between one sticker now or one each later, and close to significance with the tendency to delay to share in the choice between one sticker self now or one each later.

However, given that our main findings were not even close to significance, we do not expect that adding the remaining seven participants would have led to different results.

Given the mixed changes in the fit indices and the p-value being close to significance, we decided to retain the UPDRS III gait subscore in the full model, which is summarized in Table 3 . 3.7.

Moreover, both molecules reduced the load of aggregated SQSTM1 (Fig EV5B ) and of cytosolic aggresomes (although Apamin to an extent only close to significance; P ‐value: 0.07 – Fig EV5C ).

(2009 [ 27 ]), there was nowhere close to significance of any change in systolic pressures (again, systolic pressures were similar between the current study and Cornish et al. 2009 [ 27 ]).

Odds Ratio computed for actual back pain experience is 1.491, CI .95 (.93−2.16), so it is only close to significance, for BJJ practitioners.

The 12-month survival rates were 79% for the pre-pandemic period and 100% for the pandemic period, at 24 months The log-rank test indicates a p -value of 0.051, suggesting no statistically significant difference in survival probabilities between the two periods, although the p -value is close to significance, as shown in Figure 2 . 4.

However, among women, the increasing group was close to significance (1.51 (0.94 to 2.42)).

WKY rats had 49 different brain lipid species between non-stressed (control) and stressed groups that reached close to significance following FDR correction.

At 2 mM (basal) glucose, F6P, F1,6BP and NADH were significantly increased, and the increase in the combined abundance of DHAP and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (GA3P) was close to significance.

However, proportional deviation from covariation plane evaluated by PV3 demonstrated a trend close to significance showing a better plane fitting after HAL therapy for acute but not for chronic group; quantitative comparison between PV3 before and after HAL therapy were close to significance for acute group only (Figure 3D , PV3 mean acute-pre: 0.03 ± 0.01, acute-post: 0.02 ± 0.007, chronic-pre: 0.013 ± 0.009, chronic-post: 0.012 ± 0.009.

TIR metrics were close to significance.

The LAT and LEMD parameters are inversely correlated (r = − 0.79, p = 0.01) in Group B; this relationship in inverted and close to significance in Group A (Fig. 6 middle).

Average urinary calcium excretion was lower close to significance.

It is worth noting that the p-value of the analysis of mean EMI differences between conditions was close to significance (0.06).

Moreover, despite the non-significance of groups post-treatment, all comparisons were close to significance.

SF2 was significantly associated with intentions in the model that excluded prior intentions and working as a nurse at 18 months (OR 1.76 95%CI 1.12 – 2.76) and close to significance in the full model (Table 3 ).

Taking the smallest P -value across all burden tests performed, only CHRNB4 was close to significance ( P -value 5.72 · 10 − 6 ), whereas CHRNA5 and CHRNA3 had P -values 0.24 and 0.41, respectively.

The S-V correlation is close to significance, and it is possible that the rounding of measurement figures had an influence on this outcome.

By contrast, with ROTI, CV decreased at 10 and 20 minutes, but only came close to significance at 20 minutes of ischemia.