“close to significance”

Due to the small sample size, results close to significance (0.1 level) were indicated, along with significance at the p < 0.05 level.

It should be noted that, given the sample sizes of both groups (controls and professional footballers), there were numerous variables with p -values close to significance ( p < 0.05).

The gender difference in BMI was close to significance ( p =0.05).

The OS tends to be longer in MSI tumors than MSS tumors (109.71 versus 74.08), with a difference close to significance ( P = 0.05).

The differences between groups were close to significance levels (d = −0.37, 95 % CI – [−0.743; 0.001], t = −2.77, p = 0.05).

However, differences in stiffness measured on the deltoid and brachioradialis in the impaired and unimpaired limbs were close to significance ( p = 0.0503 and 0.06, respectively).

The proportion of LLIN users on the previous night was 52.1% (95% CI [48.6-55.5]), and the difference between transmission patterns was close to significance threshold (p = 0.0503, Table 9 ).

The type of horse showed a trend in the multivariable analysis, ordinal scale ( p = 0.0643), and was close to significance in the multivariable analysis, nominal scale, ( p = 0.0504) ( Table 2 and Table 5 ).

Another genus which showed close to significance over-time differences (F (2,24) = 3.392, p = 0.0504) and significant group differences (F (1,24) = 7.838, p = 0.0099) and interaction (F (2,24) = 7.937, p = 0.046) was the genus Butyricicoccus.

Additionally, the difference of the MSF_sc at 16.5 years after menarche to the peak at 5 years after menarche was found to be close to significance with p = 0.0505.

One additional miRNA (miR-103a-3p) had a p -value close to significance ( p -value = 0.0506) ( Table 3 and Supplementary Figure S1 ).

On the other hand, the 1470–1490 cm −1 and 1570–1630 cm −1 FTIR spectra ranges allowed the proposed models to have both model-fit indices as expected for excellent model fitting and with significant paths, except for one from SV_CHH to GPRE, which was close to significance ( p = 0.0506) but turned out to be important in other studies [ 46 ].

For the peak vertical force, the multiple regression models was close to significance (P = 0.051).

The difference in %AO by DCX between the ECT group and the DC group (mean=0.31) was close to significance ( p = 0.051).

In other words, BJHS tends to persist in females while, conversely, IMSP mainly involves males and this difference is close to significance ( p = 0.051).

However, we observed that in several of the assessed conditions, Rho value was higher than 0.7 (correlated variables), and in the case of heterozygous mice injected with the lower dose, correlation between virus titer and activity in the liver was close to significance (p = 0.051).

According to Duncan’s test, this difference was close to significance ( p = 0.051).

In the dStr, morphine treatment augmented Penk expression in the DBA strain (significant treatment factor: F 1,35 = 6.42, p = 0.016), and a similar trend was observed in the C57 strain with the p-value close to significance (F 1,35 = 4.1, p = 0.051).

Our data suggest there is an association (close to significance) between cognitive fusion and an increased risk of headaches in ICU nurses ( p = 0.051).

The difference in fit was close to significance only for emotional abuse, χ 2 (2, n = 9,152) = 5.96, p = 0.051, and sexual abuse, χ 2 (2, n = 9,152) = 5.85, p = 0.054.

There was a significant difference ( Figure 6 A) between ApEn of left and right knee flexion (t(12.49) = −2.68, p = 0.02) with hip flexion close to significance (t(17.88) = −2.10, p = 0.051) in the PD group.

Individuals with OSA had a significantly higher IOP in the left eye ( p < 0.05) and a p -value close to significance for the IOP level in right eye ( p = 0.051).

However, improvement with envelope expansion was close to significance for pairs differing by both place of articulation and voicing (mean difference: 10.2%; SD: 18.1%; t (31) = 3.2, p = 0.051) and for voiced fricative pairs differing by place of articulation (mean difference: 11.7%; SD: 22.1%; t (31) = 3.0, p = 0.074).

With an OR (95% CI) of 2.85 (1.15-7.05) (p=0.023), the association was statistically significant for nuclear ANA and close to significance for “at least one positive AAB test” (1.99 (0.996-3.98), p=0.051).

As expected, urinary glucose was higher in individuals with T2D (2.31 ± 6.21 g/L) compared to those with preDM (0.08 ± 0.05 g/L) and NonDM (0.45 ± 1.42 g/L), with a p -value close to significance ( p = 0.051).