“close to significance”

For the peak vertical force, the multiple regression models was close to significance (P = 0.051).

As mentioned, the observed trend, though close to significance ( p = 0.051), could be due to the low power of the study and needs confirmation.

For the correct score in the open experiment the difference was close to significance, F (2, 41) = 3.20, p = 0.051.

By contrast, the number of bees did not differ significantly along the gradient, but it was close to significance (0.18–0.35 individuals h −1 trap −1 ; R 2 = 0.25, df = 15, P = 0.051).

No significant differences between urban and rural residents were found in the average age at FI, but the test statistic is close to significance at p = 0.051.

Although the results from the Chi-square test were not significant, they are close to significance ( χ 2 = 7.763; df = 3; p = .051).

In the dStr, morphine treatment augmented Penk expression in the DBA strain (significant treatment factor: F 1,35 = 6.42, p = 0.016), and a similar trend was observed in the C57 strain with the p-value close to significance (F 1,35 = 4.1, p = 0.051).

There were no significant differences at the genus level between sample 2 and the negative control after correcting for multiple comparisons; however, 38 genera were close to significance ( p = 0.051).

However, we observed that in several of the assessed conditions, Rho value was higher than 0.7 (correlated variables), and in the case of heterozygous mice injected with the lower dose, correlation between virus titer and activity in the liver was close to significance (p = 0.051).

reported a slight association between non-V600E cases and elevated PD-L1 expression (42% in V600E and 50% in non-V600E), even though the values were close to significance ( p = 0.051) [ 38 ].

With an OR (95% CI) of 2.85 (1.15-7.05) (p=0.023), the association was statistically significant for nuclear ANA and close to significance for “at least one positive AAB test” (1.99 (0.996-3.98), p=0.051).

However, improvement with envelope expansion was close to significance for pairs differing by both place of articulation and voicing (mean difference: 10.2%; SD: 18.1%; t (31) = 3.2, p = 0.051) and for voiced fricative pairs differing by place of articulation (mean difference: 11.7%; SD: 22.1%; t (31) = 3.0, p = 0.074).

However, the effect of the intervention on social influence and the effect on self-efficacy were close to significance moderated by educational ( p = .051) and income level ( p = .076), respectively.

According to Duncan’s test, this difference was close to significance ( p = 0.051).

Finally, the ANOVA conducted on SD ML indicated that the Expertise × Segment × Vision interaction was close to significance [ F (6, 138) = 2.16, p = 0.051].

During N2, the condition main effect was also significant for beta-high (frontal F(1,26.907) = 4.967, p = .034; central F(1,26.620) = 5.957, p = .022) and for frontal beta-low (F(1,26.937) = 5.101, p = .032) while close to significance in the central beta-low (F(1,26.714) = 4.183, p = .051).

There was a significant difference ( Figure 6 A) between ApEn of left and right knee flexion (t(12.49) = −2.68, p = 0.02) with hip flexion close to significance (t(17.88) = −2.10, p = 0.051) in the PD group.

Mean DT and SP (± SEM) in bias-for and bias-against trials were close to significance when subjects performed the all-away condition after the all-stay condition (n = 8, paired-samples t-test p = 0.051 for DTs and p = 0.164 for SPs; bias-for: 1.73 ± 0.06 and 83 ± 2%; bias-against: 1.56 ± 0.05 s and 78 ± 4%) and significantly different when they performed the all-away condition at first (n = 7, paired-samples t-test p < 0.05; p = 0.0152, t = 3.36 for DTs and p = 0.0171, t = 3.26 for SPs; bias-for: 1.94 ± 0.07 s and 89 ± 2%; bias-against: 1.75 ± 0.09 s and 83 ± 3%).

Our data suggest there is an association (close to significance) between cognitive fusion and an increased risk of headaches in ICU nurses ( p = 0.051).

The difference in %AO by DCX between the ECT group and the DC group (mean=0.31) was close to significance ( p = 0.051).

However, some SNPs were close to significance: BCL11A rs1427407 ( p = 0.051) and BCL11A rs11886868 ( p = 0.06).

These analyses revealed that for the FTF condition, gaze aversion was the only cue to come close to significance, F (1, 81) = 3.94, p = .051.

In addition, the reaction temperature (Temp) seemed to have a significant effect on glucan digestibility ( p = 0.0182) and showed a clear-cut tendency (close to significance) to affect XMG digestibility ( p = 0.0511).

In the gamma band, no group was different at the post-hoc analysis, with HC and AS being close to significance ( p = .0513).

Testing both T-containing genotypes together (TT/CT) versus CC, the MTIF3 mRNA decrease was close to significance ( P = .0518).