This trend became more apparent when we compared signal responses by gender, with EE male mice having the lowest values and close to significance compared to EE females (p = 0.0301, with p < 0.0250 for significance due to multiple testing; Fig. 2 C).
Differences were close to significance on the OQ total score ( F (1, 77) = 4.83, p = .031), with more change in CBI ( d = −0.49).
A within-participants ANOVA incorporating factors of memory and scalp location again revealed main effects of memory [200–1100 ms: F (1, 22) = 7.15, p = 0.014, η p 2 = 0.245; 1100–2000 ms: F (1, 22) = 7.83, p = 0.010, η p 2 = 0.262] and interactions between memory and location that also reached or were close to significance [200–1100 ms: F (1, 22) = 5.19, p = 0.033, η p 2 = 0.191; 1100–2000 ms: F (1, 22) = 4.16, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.159].
However, some results close to significance on imputed data were significant on complete case data; this was the case for change in belief (coefficient 0.15, 95% CI [0.01, 0.30], p = 0.036) and for the relation between belief and analgesic use (adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI [0.81, 0.99], p = 0.031).
The DysRSP was activated in mice using the sequential egocentric strategy, its recruitment being also close to significance in allocentric mice (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.04, sequential egocentric versus swimming controls Mann-Whitney U , p = 0.02, allocentric versus swimming controls Mann-Whitney U , p = 0.06 for DysRSP; Fig. 2I ).
However, it was not significant in model 2 ( P = .167) and remained close to significance in model 3 ( P = .042).
Importantly, the interaction between Rating score and Condition was close to significance, t = 2, p = .045.
Indeed, patients with clinical benefit exhibited higher levels of these signatures compared to those with lack of benefit; some were statistically significant while others were close to significance (TEFF score, MWW, P = 0.046) (Fig. 2A , Fig.
sudetica , the interaction between species and sex was only close to significance ( p = 0.047) for the body but non‐significant for the wings, whereas for the two E. euryale subspecies the interaction was only significant for the body.
* indicates the p -value was close to significance (0.1 > p > 0.05).
Furthermore, HA and OCN had close to significance p -values (respectively p = 0.050 and p = 0.060), which warrants further investigation on larger studies.
It should be noted that, given the sample sizes of both groups (controls and professional footballers), there were numerous variables with p -values close to significance ( p < 0.05).
In contrast, in the eyes that underwent IVB, no significant increase was observed at any of the follow-ups; only the increase in visual acuity in month 1 was close to significance ( P =0.05).
The association between anti-MPO ANCA and eGFR was close to significance ( P = 0.05).
There was a trend of greater weight loss in patients in both cohorts after surgery, and the statistics were close to significance ( p = 0.050) ( Table 3 IC; Figure 2 II).
The main effect of time was close to significance [F (2,56) = 3.163, p = .050].
We included guaiacol and diethyl malonate in the DEC and healthy groups in the following analysis since these metabolites where close to significance (fold change >2 and p = 0.05).
The differences between groups were close to significance levels (d = −0.37, 95 % CI – [−0.743; 0.001], t = −2.77, p = 0.05).
However, there were significant differences between these two groups for family history of breast cancer ( χ 2 = 3.828, P <0.001), total life satisfaction ( χ 2 = 15.990, P <0.001), current life satisfaction ( χ 2 = 12.461, P <0.001), and frequency of exercise ( χ 2 = 5.207, P = 0.022), and the P -value for annual family income was close to significance ( χ 2 = 3.828, P = 0.05) (Table 1 ).
Three miRs had a fold change (relapse versus control) that was close to significance (LIMMA, raw p value = 0.05): hsa-miR-532-3p, hsa-miR-487b, and hsa-miR-210.
In PL group, insulin level dropped after training in males ( p < 0.05) and the drop of insulin in AX group was close to significance in females ( p = 0.05) (Table 1 ).
No difference was detected between VKA and DOAC groups for median age at diagnosis, sex, thrombosis site, presence of cavernomatosis, or esophageal varices, whereas a close to significance difference was detected for risk factors of thrombosis ( p = 0.05).
3.3 Metabolic factors, BMI, and sex Linear analyses between metabolic factors and BMI revealed that only the association between UA and BMI was close to significance in male PD group; however, no correlation was observed by multiple regression analysis after adjusting for age and course of disease, and smoking history ( p > .05), and no correlation was found after adjusting for age, course of disease, and menopause in female patients. 3.4 Cognitive function, BMI, and sex There was no significant difference in MoCA between male and female PD, but male patients were more prominent in language ( p = .04).
Complications were significant in the transfused Group II (P = .007), very close to significance for the Age group ≥30 years (P=.05), and close to significance for the number of crises, but insignificant for preoperative Hb-S, mean preoperative hemoglobin, and the operative time.
Subarachnoid hemorrhage was close to significance (OR = 1.17; 95% CI [1.00–1.36]; p = 0.05).