“close to significance”

The effect of guild was significant for h-index and close to significance for total number of papers (χ 2 = 19.29, p<0.05; χ 2 = 17.03, p = 0.07).

3.3 Metabolic factors, BMI, and sex Linear analyses between metabolic factors and BMI revealed that only the association between UA and BMI was close to significance in male PD group; however, no correlation was observed by multiple regression analysis after adjusting for age and course of disease, and smoking history ( p > .05), and no correlation was found after adjusting for age, course of disease, and menopause in female patients. 3.4 Cognitive function, BMI, and sex There was no significant difference in MoCA between male and female PD, but male patients were more prominent in language ( p = .04).

In the disease burden model, the DBIS score, gender, age, being separated or divorced, being retired, being permanently sick or disabled, and hospital admissions were significant predictors ( Table 6 ), and gender and being retired were close to significance ( p =0.05).

Results During postintervention assessment, there were no significant differences between the intervention arms and the control group in the CES-D, although the difference between the iCBT arm and control group was close to significance ( p = 0.05) in favor of iCBT.

For the interaction ‘previous dementia training’ and gender on the total ADQ score the effect was close to significance ( F (1, 1766) = 3.97, p = .05).

Although there was a difference close to significance in leg strength in the collagen group, in general, pre and post-evaluations of all parameters in the collagen and placebo groups revealed similar results ( p > 0.05).

The correlation between DaT availability (putaminal z -score) and PCA expression scores was close to significance for the entire DLB-cohort, driven by a substantial correlation in DLB-DaT(−) patients (all DLB: p = 0.050, R 2 = 0.036; DLB-DaT(−): p = 0.029, R 2 = 0.216; Supplemental Fig. 5B ).

Pairwise comparisons (using a corrected threshold for multiple comparisons: α′ = 0.017) showed that generalisation within aldehydes was significantly higher than within primary alcohols (χ 2 = 11.80, df = 1, p < 0.0006) and ketones (χ 2 = 9.90, df = 1, p < 0.005) and close to significance in favour of aldehydes when compared to secondary alcohols (χ 2 = 4.40, df = 1, 0.017 < p < 0.05).

In contrast, in the eyes that underwent IVB, no significant increase was observed at any of the follow-ups; only the increase in visual acuity in month 1 was close to significance ( P =0.05).

No main effect of time was found either for APP all (although close to significance, p =.050) or for RPP all (p =.129).

Theoretically, from the result, the N retention will be different among treatment, but in fact, from this study, there was no significant difference (p=0.052 close to significance level p<0.05).

The association between anti-MPO ANCA and eGFR was close to significance ( P = 0.05).

Such association was close to significance in males (p = 0.05), but not in females, even if in the two subgroups the H2 haplotype carriers tended to be more frequent among CAD patients (data not shown).

Complications were significant in the transfused Group II (P = .007), very close to significance for the Age group ≥30 years (P=.05), and close to significance for the number of crises, but insignificant for preoperative Hb-S, mean preoperative hemoglobin, and the operative time.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage was close to significance (OR = 1.17; 95% CI [1.00–1.36]; p = 0.05).

p = 0.04) and was close to significance with VO 2peak (r = -0.51. p = 0.05).

It was close to significance in the case of grocery workers ( F = 3.20 and p = 0.05), who showed lower psychological impacts in May–June ( M = 36.88 and SD = 19.60) than in March ( M = 47.82 and SD = 18.77) and April ( M = 45.72 and SD = 16.15), but the post-hoc Tuckey test revealed no significant differences. 3.2.

Gender-based differences in screening eligibility were only significant in patients born from 1935 to 1944 (OR = 1.23, p = 0.03) and close to significance in those born from 1925 to 1934 (OR = 1.24, p = 0.05).

The percentile group of Pulmonary Anatomy and Physiology was close to significance but p > .05.

2B ), whereas a tendency close to significance emerged with body mass index ( r = 0.22, 95% CI −0.006 to 0.42, P = 0.05, Fig. 2C ).

However, there were significant differences between these two groups for family history of breast cancer ( χ 2 = 3.828, P <0.001), total life satisfaction ( χ 2 = 15.990, P <0.001), current life satisfaction ( χ 2 = 12.461, P <0.001), and frequency of exercise ( χ 2 = 5.207, P = 0.022), and the P -value for annual family income was close to significance ( χ 2 = 3.828, P = 0.05) (Table 1 ).

In PL group, insulin level dropped after training in males ( p < 0.05) and the drop of insulin in AX group was close to significance in females ( p = 0.05) (Table 1 ).

The interaction of ‘condition’ × ‘announcement’ was only close to significance, F (1, 27) = 4.199, p = 0.050, η 2 = 0.012, and ordinal, so both main effects could be interpreted independent of the interaction.

The Kruskal–Wallis test showed differences close to significance between NRG1 rs3934999 genotypes and the dose of risperidone per day (Chi-squared = 5.9, df = 2, p = 0.05), suggesting further investigation should be considered.

Also, in synchronous condition, the correlations between the Q4 ratings and the PD values immediately and 2 min after stimulation was close to significance (immediately, r = 0.438, p = 0.05; 2 min, r = 0.432, p = 0.05).