Barely Significant
← all phrases

“close to significance”

2,131 sentences · 2,131 papers · 2,937 search hits before verification

In the literature

close to significancep = 0.0180.4× alpha
There was only one association that was close to significance across regressions: being a female TCW was associated with relating higher potential for suicide risk to hopelessness features among female callers at p = 0.018 ( b = −0.40, Standard Error = 0.17, sr 2 = −0.20; Adj R 2 = 0.03, F (2, 133) = 3.06, p = 0.05). 4.
close to significancep = .0180.4× alpha
Post hoc Mann Whitney U analysis, with Bonferroni corrections applied ( p = .017), confirmed a significant difference between F2s and final year medical students (U = 2130.500, z = −2.996, p = .003, r = −0.24), close to significance with middle grades (U = 2031.00, z = −2.367, p = .018, r = 0.19656866), but no significant difference when compared with F1s (U = 3.103.500, z = −0.247, p = .805, r = 0.02).
close to significancep = 0.0210.4× alpha
Differences in pupil dilation were also close to significance between the time of presentation of the pseudoword as compared with the baseline (Z = −2.30; p = 0.021; Cliff’s δ = 0.16), and the time of presentation of the pseudoword as compared with the period following the fading of the pseudoword (Z = −2.32; p = 0.020; Cliff’s δ = 0.16), after having been applied Bonferroni correction to adjust the p -values for multiple post hoc comparisons ( p = 0.17).
close to significancep = 0.0250.5× alpha
Differences in the inter-tentacle angles in Foton-M3 data (Figure S2C ) are close to significance level: for postflight group phase 0 and T0 angles were smaller, than for preflight control ( p = 0.025 and p = 0.067 correspondingly in dependent t -test); the delta (T0-0) angle was higher in postflight group ( p = 0.051 in dependent t -test).
close to significancep-values = 0.030.6× alpha
The PIE indexes were 0.87 (one dose only) and 0.86 (two doses), suggesting large diversity in the networks, and the co-occurrence was formally statistically significant or close to significance, suggesting that there was strong preference for some comparisons (C-score p-values = 0.03 and 0.06 for single dose and two doses networks).