“close to being statistically significant”

DISCUSSION The salient findings of our study are as follows: (1) at a simulated intraocular pressure of 50 mmHg, there is a statistically significant difference in total volume of egressed fluid from the silicone tube with one versus two fenestration(s); (2) there is no significant difference if simulated IOP is 40 mmHg or less (the 40 mmHg group was very close to being statistically significant with a P -value of 0.08); (3) in the opening pressure trials, the second fenestration opened at a pressure of 28.83 ± 5.09 mmHg.

While this is true, the results show that the variable was not even close to being statistically significant for restaurant revenues.

In this trial, the findings for CSE were close to being statistically significant overall, with the subscale measuring the ability to control unpleasant thoughts and emotions showing significant improvement over time in the intervention group.

A p < 0.10 was used to avoid missing variables that were close to being statistically significant.

There was statistically significant difference between groups for overall survival and there was close to being statistically significant difference between groups for local relapse-free survival.

On islands with greater isolation, shrub abundance was higher, although this trend was close to being statistically significant.

The difference is statistically significant for one sub-set, ‘Students’ Perceptions of Learning,’ and the difference is close to being statistically significant for the ‘Students’ Perception of Teachers’ sub-set.

The only highlights are the decrease in the magnitude of the positive association between relative consumption of ultra-processed foods and calcium content in the diet, and the negative association between the relative consumption of these foods and the content of vitamin C in the diet, which is close to being statistically significant.

However, the findings in PSW for women ( p = 0.052) were close to being statistically significant, possibly indicative of societal norms and cultural factors that place a greater emphasis on appearance for women.

Having secondary education shows a trend that is close to being statistically significant, suggesting that with a larger and more diverse sample from different geo‐demographic contexts.

While the estimated coefficients fluctuate around zero for the different specifications, none of them is close to being statistically significant at the 5% level.

Therefore, some results that came relatively close to being statistically significant may not have reached significance, because of the small size of this sub-group.

The evaluation of fAGP and six tumor makers to diagnose malignancy indicated that CA19-9 ( p = 0.0019) and SPan-1 ( p = 0.0241) had a statistically significant difference in pancreas cancer but that no such significance was observed in the other factors nor in the other diseases with all factors even though there were a few exceptions that were close to being statistically significant.

For Sussex County, the relationship between obesity-related mortality causes and per-capita income was close to being statistically significant (5.13%).

The genotypes of rs3181098 were close to being statistically significant (GG vs.

As shown in Table 9 , raised risks were observed in all age-at-risk groups, although only for the 65+ age-at-risk group was the relative risk close to being statistically significant greater than 1 (RR = 2.04 (95% CI 0.96, 4.35) after adjustment for chemotherapy and hormonal therapy), based on 15 cases among irradiated patients.

11 29 34 Analyses showed no statistically significant difference in the incidence of bacteriuria (pooled OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.01; p=0.06), noting this was close to being statistically significant.

However, the p -value is very close to being statistically significant, and it might be a tendency.

The adjusted prevalence of osteoporosis among T2DM patients increased from 3.13% (95% CI 1.39–4.87%) to 6.10% (95% CI 4.47–7.75%) during 2005–2014, and the linear trend was close to being statistically significant (P linear trend = 0.054).

The differences were close to being statistically significant for the C group in comparison to CV and Fr in comparison to FrV.

The correlation between the mean dose and SUVmean relative difference was significant in five assessed regions: R hippocampus (r (22) = 0.45, p = 0.03), L occipital lobe (r (23) = 0.52, p = 0.01), L parietal lobe (r (23) = 0.66, p = 0.001), frontal lobe (r (23) = 0.42, p = 0.05), and R occipital lobe (r (23) = 0.55, p = 0.01), and one assessed region, the cerebellum (r (23) = 0.37, p = 0.08), was close to being statistically significant ( Table 3a ).

While there were no significant differences in age, gender and tumour site between the two groups, the P value of the age comparison was very close to being statistically significant ( Table 1 ). 3.3 Comparison of the CT enhancement rate as a function of the tumour necrosis rate Comparison of the initial CT enhancement rate pre-chemotherapy: the average enhancement rate was 1.75 (median 1.68, range 1.18–2.51) in the group with a necrosis rate greater than 90% and 1.62 (median 1.52, range 1.00–2.41) in the group with a necrosis rate<90%.

The relationship between volatility and project fragmentation is close to being statistically significant at the 10% level.

While the number of ER+PR− tumours giving rise to this hypothesis was comparatively small (19 out of 189), the OR associated with uPA–PAI-1 was remarkably similar to the one observed among patients without hormonal receptors and neither of them was close to being statistically significant.

Additionally, the association between GDM and lung cancer was close to being statistically significant (HR = 1.19; 95%CI: 0.98–1.44).