Trial number was weak and not even close to being statistically significant.
← all phrases
“close to being statistically significant”
Sighted at
p=0.055
In the literature
Although no statistically significant sex-based difference was found, it was close to being statistically significant.
Hearing acuity was close to being statistically significant.
13 Similar to findings from a Spanish study, for patients aged 3 years or younger, the correlation between subjects’ scores in the food anxiety domain and FAIM-PF scores was close to being statistically significant with a P value of 0.088, while only EI and SDL domain scores were positively associated with FAIM-PF scores. 15 Significant correlations between K-FAQLQ-PF and FAIM-PF outcomes were observed in the age groups of 4–6-year-olds and 7–12-year-olds in this study.