“close to being statistically significant”

The interaction N100*group is also close to being statistically significant (F = 2.70, p = 0.087).

Moreover, in our study, the sensitivity of IIC also improved with tumor stage from 17% for T1 staged tumors to 50% for T3 staged tumors; the difference was close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.087).

Additionally, it seems that bike-sharing users demanding the improvement of bike infrastructure (e.g., extending current bike lanes) would be willing to pay more in a statistically significant way since this result is close to being statistically significant (p-value = 0.096).

However, an overall trend for slower peak growth rate of wings in species nesting higher above ground was apparent, as in addition to the three relationships being statistically significant, further four were close to being statistically significant (with p < 0.1; Tables S11 and S12 in Additional File 1 ).

However, Model 2 and Model 3 in Table 8 show that both IST P (correct) and IST Accuracy approach providing additional explanation of variation in the avoidance of rational thinking errors and are close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.1027 and p = 0.1063, respectively).

In the positive CK7 prediction group, OS was also poorer than negative prediction group (P = 0.052), which was very close to being statistically significant and RFS was not good enough (P = 0.113) (Fig. 9 ).

Patients with aneuploidy had an estimated HR of 3.8 that was close to being statistically significant ( P =0.13, 95% CI=(0.6, 23.7)), whereas patients with elevated 4N fraction did not show an elevated risk of subsequent detection of HGD or EAC in this sample (HR=1.2, P =0.84, 95% CI=(0.2, 7.3); Figure 3c , Table 2 ).

However, this was only close to being statistically significant ( p = 0.14 and p = 0.23, respectively).

This small difference might be real, but it is negligible in magnitude and is not even close to being statistically significant ( z = 1.08, p = 0.274).

This increase in metabolic stability of the chlorinated compounds was found to be close to being statistically significant with a t -test p -value of 0.06.

These changes are close to being statistically significant with p-values of 0.09 and 0.05.

The only variable that came close to being statistically significant was age, but it still failed to meet the nominal alpha level.

GDF-15 (ln-transformed) was not significantly associated with overall survival, neither in simple analysis nor after adjustment for these predictors; however, the association was close to being statistically significant ( Table 5 ).

Two additional results are close to being statistically significant.

The higher median in the Work group over time was also close to being statistically significant.

We have also attempted to establish aging-related differences at the phosphoproteome level, particularly in regards to mitochondrial processes (see figure below), but only GOcc: mitochondrion and GObp: mitochondrial transport come close to being statistically significant (raw p-values of 0.05 and 0.08, respectively) in the control comparison.

In a more recent trial, MB monotherapy in 60 West African adults with falciparum malaria (a fixed dose of 780 mg for 3 days) showed a 100% cure rate when MB was given for 7 days compared to a 85% cure rate when MB was given for a shorter time period; this difference was close to being statistically significant [ 59 ].

In our study, in the results involving vaccinations up to age seven months and up to age 18 months, that is, the later ones, a trend of treatment with antidepressants reducing the risk of non-vaccination was seen, and the results were very close to being statistically significant.

Despite such a huge crossover in first line comparison, a numerical advantage close to being statistically significant was yet achieved.

However, this finding was close to being statistically significant with the upper confidence limit just including zero (SMD -0.33; 95% CI, − 0.68 to 0.01).

The pre-treatment leptin concentrations were close to being statistically significant.

When the variables were dichotomized, both cycles <6 (HR=1.372, 95% CI=0.957–1.967, P =0.085) and TAC >42 days (HR=1.415, 95% CI=0.964–2.077, P =0.076) were close to being statistically significant predictors of OS but not PFS (Model 3).

Only the A-a gradient was close to being statistically significant.

However, extreme downward educational mobility was close to being statistically significant (OR = 3.053; 95% CI = 0.991 ... 9.393) among women, where experiencing this form of mobility corresponded to elevated odds of reporting good/fair/poor health.

However, the accumulated dose of GCs was close to being statistically significant only in distinguish high-NAR and low-NAR classification (1.01; 1.000–1.020; 0.055) (Additional file 1 ).