Barely Significant
← all phrases

“borderline significant”

11,410 sentences · 11,410 papers · 14,072 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantP = 0.051.0× alphagold
After adjustment for sex, age, and eGFR, corrected calcium, inorganic phosphate CRP, diuretic use model, systolic blood pressure, and history of hypertension (model 4), the association between the highest FGF23 tertile and LVH Association between the highest FGF23 and LVH was found to be borderline significant (P = 0.05).
borderline significantP = 0.051.0× alphagold
A borderline significant association was found with those who have shorter incarcerated period and clustering (21 vs. 14 days; OR = 1.01 [95% CI: 1–1.01], P = 0.05; Table 3 ) while receiving income assistance (e.g., disability check, military, TANF, AFDC) (29% vs. 16%; OR = 0.477 [95% CI: 0.29–0.80], P = 0.005; Table 3 ) decreased the odds of being in a cluster.
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
There was a slight increase in the odds of having ocular surface symptoms after adjusting for age and gender, but it was borderline significant (OR: 4.28, 95% CI, 0.93-19.58, p = 0.05) Of the 74 subjects identified as having symptoms of ocular surface disorders according to the OSDI score, only 16 were identified as abnormal by the Schirmer’s test.
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
VGF showed a different pattern with evidently lower values in patients with AD dementia than in control subjects (β = −0.46 [SE 0.19]) and in patients with MCI (−0.93 [SE 0.22]), whereas the difference between patients with MCI and control subjects was only borderline significant (β = 0.47 [SE 0.20], p = 0.05).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Composition variation was also found among the HA subgroups (HA-1, HA-2, and HA-3), which was also not significant (all p > 0.05), with exceptions for Bacteroides uniformis and Mediterraneibacter gravus , which were borderline significant between HA-2 and HA-3 and between AD and HA-3 (both p = 0.05), respectively ( Figure 1 and Figure 2 ).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Similar observations were demonstrated in the CON group, with a borderline significant ( p = 0.05) reduction in SBP of −1.4 mmHg [−2.8;0.0] and a significant ( p = 0.03) reduction in DBP of −1.5 mmHg [−2.8;−0.1], resulting in a reduction ( p = 0.01) in MAP of −1.5 mmHg [−2.6;−0.3].