“borderline significant”

These differences in treatment effects were borderline significant (p = 0.05) (Fig. 3 E, F).

Laboratory findings showed that WBC values were slightly higher in the fibrotic group ( Table 2 ), but the difference was borderline significant (p=0.05); there was no significant difference between the groups in CRP and LDH values.

For the older age, anti-HSV antibody was borderline significant (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97–1.00, P =0.05).

However, educational level was found to be borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

Cat ownership showed a borderline significant association with seropositivity (OR = 3.79, p = 0.05).

For NEUTs, a borderline significant decrease was observed between points II and III ( p = 0.05).

In addition, while the AUC of DNI in patients with USG abnormalities was borderline significant ( P = 0.05) it was nearly comparable to that of CRP, both of which being much more significant than either the WBC count and ESR.

In terms of oral intake, we found a 7.6% increase in mean oral intake amount per meal for modified purees compared to traditional purees, which was borderline significant in statistical analysis ( p = 0.05).

The HR for incident microalbuminuria was borderline significant after adjustment with diabetes duration, sex, HbA 1c , systolic blood pressure, and history of smoking (1.18 [1.00–1.39]), p = 0.05, however, neither this association was independent of triglycerides (HR 1.13 [0.93–1.34], p = 0.15).

The interaction between Immunescore and ProliferativeIndex was borderline significant in univariable analysis of the ER-positive subset (HR 0.68, CI 95% 0.46–1.0, p = 0.050) and significant in analysis of all tumors (HR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47–0.84, p = 0.001), Supplementary Data S4 .

NK cells showed a temporary decrease at Week 2 with a borderline significant time effect ( p = 0.050), followed by partial recovery.

There was a positive, borderline significant, moderate correlation between plasma IL6 and sIL6R and the respective gene expression levels (rho 0.23 and 0.22, both p = 0.05).

Controlling for average distance to health facility, number of antenatal care visits, education of women, and parity, planning to save money was associated with giving birth with the assistance of a skilled provider, although the association was borderline significant (p=0.05).

The total semen bacterial load remained independently associated with semen VL in multivariate logistic regression ( t = 2.80, p = 0.007), while the association with blood VL became borderline significant ( t = 2.00, p = 0.05).

The number of voxels representing high ΔSI (bolus) muscle values in infected rats, relative to corresponding controls at each time point, showed a steady decline as infection progressed (Linear regression analysis, borderline significant, P = 0.05).

A borderline significant correlation was present when exciting with 440 nm (r = 0.57, p = 0.05) and 750 nm (r = 0.55, p = 0.06).

Secondary Outcomes: Total and Aerobic Activity Times In phase I (Table 2 ), the unblinded and blinded groups were not significantly different in modifying their total activity times, whereas there was a borderline significant smaller decrease in aerobic time in unblinded patients (differential 8 minutes; 95% CI, 0 to 16; P =0.05).

In the transfemoral-access cohort, TAVI resulted in a borderline significant reduction in death from any cause or disabling stroke compared to SAVR (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62–1.00; p = 0.05).

While there was a marginally significant positive effect of distance on F ST ( r = 0.25, p = .05), absolute divergence Dxy did not increase significantly with distance ( r = 0.24, p = .11), and pairwise genetic differentiation of Euclidean distances was borderline significant ( r = 0.21, p = .05, Figure 3a,b ; Figure S6 ).

In the 1-back test, ch1 and ch2 had a borderline significant correlation with rMSSD (ch1: r = −0.304, p = 0.050; ch2: r = −0.292, p = 0.061), and the oxy-Hb concentrations of ch5 and ch6 were significantly negatively correlated with rMSSD (ch5: r = −0.350, p = 0.023; ch6: r = −0.324, p = 0.036).

There was no distribution difference among the male subgroups; however, a borderline significant association on the allelic level was observed between the CHD cases and the healthy controls in the female-stratified test (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.35–1.00, P=0.05).

Moreover, in a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 106 patients with both NAFLD and T2DM who were assigned to receive empagliflozin 10 mg ( n = 35), pioglitazone 30 mg ( n = 34), or placebo ( n = 37) for 24 weeks, only a borderline significant decrease in CAP score was observed with empagliflozin compared with placebo (−29.6 dB/m (−39.5 to −19.6) vs. −16.4 dB/m (−25.0 to −7.8), respectively; p = 0.05) [ 39 ].

However, the Y chromosome index was no longer significantly associated with survival when considered in a multivariate analysis with pathologic N, but did retain a borderline significant association (Wald test P = 0.05) when considered together with pathologic T.

6A ) and were borderline significant for OS (HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.059–1, p = 0.05; Fig. 6B ).

Similarly, a study done in India in 2014 [ 18 ] showed no significant correlation, but a borderline significant association was observed between MCH and HbA1c in IDA diabetic patient ( P = 0.05).