“borderline significant”

Improvement in work and social functioning was borderline significant (mean change −2.92, Hedges g = 0.28; P = 0.05).

Nor- malisation of CA 125 serum levels (35 U ml1' after two courses of chemotherapy showed a borderline significant cor- relation with survival (P = 0.05).

Colonic segment length ratios did not change significantly with age, although the differences for the rectosigmoid/L2 ratio were borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

VGF showed a different pattern with evidently lower values in patients with AD dementia than in control subjects (β = −0.46 [SE 0.19]) and in patients with MCI (−0.93 [SE 0.22]), whereas the difference between patients with MCI and control subjects was only borderline significant (β = 0.47 [SE 0.20], p = 0.05).

Our results showed a significant excess of nonsynonymous variants ( P = 0.047) in the Kinh population from Vietnam and a borderline significant excess of amino acid variation (0.1 ≥ P ≥ 0.05) in other populations of African (African Americans and the Mende), South Asian (Bengali, Gujarati, Telugu, Punjabi and Sri Lankan Tamil), European (Finnish, Great British, and Iberian), and East Asian (Dai and southern Han Chinese) ancestry (Table 1 ).

The only borderline significant (treatment effect = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.0-2.4; P = .05) differences seen in these sensitivity analyses were between the groups receiving 400 mg and 200 mg minocycline hydrochloride.

Predicted versus reoptimized plan target dose delivery In comparing the dosimetry of the single-fraction SABR predicted plans to the reoptimized plans on the first 5 setup MRI scans, there was a borderline significant 4.7% increase in the mean PTV V 95% when the predicted plan was reoptimized (85.0% vs 88.1%, P = .05; Fig 2 ).

One-way ANOVA with cluster membership as the independent variable confirmed the existence of statistically significant differences between the three groups in all dependent variables ( p < 0.05) but one, which was nevertheless borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

However, there was borderline significant heterogeneity among included trials (Cochrane's Q, p = 0.05; I 2 = 74%).

However, data indicated a borderline significant subgroup differences ( P = 0.05) between subgroups of trials that excluded participants with PTSD and those that did not: a numerically larger treatment effect was observed in the trials that excluded PTSD (SMD −0.32, 95% CI −0.60 to −0.03) versus those that did not exclude PTSD (SMD 0.02, 95% CI −0.15 to 0.18).

However, the GLM was only borderline significant for rubber tires ( Z = − 1.97, P = 0.05) but not plastic containers ( Z = − 0.80, P = 0.42) when analyzed separately.

As for the 2020 cohort, females similar to the 2009 cohort had lower or insignificantly different mean scores across the subscales and global indices, except for obsessive compulsion with borderline significant results ( t = 1.9882, p = 0.05, effect size = 0.23).

A less granular perspective was available for diabetes medications in replication cohort, but the use of any diabetes medication was borderline significant ( P = 0.05) with a higher proportion of intermittent carriers reporting the use of any diabetes medications.

Statistically significant variables ( p < 0.05) or borderline significant variables ( p = 0.05–0.10) were assessed for collinearity and entered into a logistic regression model to assess if any of these variables were predictive of AVN or final Severin grade.

Similarly, borderline significant differences were found across samples for aggregate scores [ F (6,1592) = 2.12, p = 0.05].

Baseline correlation of CMR parameters and EAT EAT was positively correlated with LV mass ( r = 0.25, p = 0.01) and showed a borderline significant association with LVEF ( r = 0.2, p = 0.05).

In terms of disease severity based on symptom score, there was a borderline significant correlation between tryptase level and symptom score ( r = 0.30, p = 0.05).

A borderline significant correlation was present when exciting with 440 nm (r = 0.57, p = 0.05) and 750 nm (r = 0.55, p = 0.06).

For NEUTs, a borderline significant decrease was observed between points II and III ( p = 0.05).

However, it must be noted that in our meta-analysis the latter study was borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

In our study we showed borderline significant excess nephrotoxicity of 7.1% of the colistin group compared to tigecycline group ( P = .05) for the baseline characteristic comparable cohorts.

The data is borderline significant at p<0.05 for the difference between the median of 56 pairs of flies.

The associations with Roseburia , Alistipes , Faecalibacterium , and Staphylococcus remained borderline significant in sensitivity analyses for SES factors ( p > 0.05) (Table S13 ).

However, the association between detectable properdin and graft failure became borderline significant after further adjustment for proteinuria (HR, 1.47; 95% CI 0.85–2.54; P = 0.05).

The meta-analysis revealed a borderline significant improvement in lower limb muscle strength with Cr versus PL ( p = 0.05; I2 = 40%; SMD = 0.29 [95% CI 0.00–0.57.00.57]), demonstrating moderate heterogeneity ( p = 0.10, I2 = 40%).