“borderline significant”

61.8%, p < 0.001), while BMI category distribution showed only a borderline significant difference by residence ( p = 0.049).

Kaplan–Meier curves suggested lower survival among patients with GNRI-defined nutritional risk, with a borderline significant difference between groups (log-rank p = 0.049) ( Figure 2 ).

There was a borderline significant interaction between ob genotype and PhIP treatment ( P = 0.049).

Two previous studies compared the integration site environment between ACs and patients with HAM/TSP and found no differences, or a borderline significant (p = 0.049) difference [ 24 , 26 ].

After 24 weeks, the level of prolargin showed a borderline significant decrease in the placebo group (p = 0.049), but no difference was observed in the n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) treated group (Fig. 4 ).

When the analysis was restricted to mothers who reported ≥80% adherence during the pregnancy period ( n = 316 in the non-LNS group and n = 134 in the LNS group), we observed a marginally significantly higher SBP in the non-LNS group than in the LNS group (99.6 ± 0.6 compared with 97.7 ± 0.9 mm Hg; P = 0.06), a borderline significant difference in SBP z score (0.70 ± 0.05 compared with 0.51 ± 0.08; P = 0.049), and a marginally significant difference in the prevalence of high BP (34.9% compared with 26.2%; P = 0.08).

MDs in the frequentist NMAs were similar to the Bayesian and at 12 weeks all the treatments were significant, however, at 24 weeks, Viviscal was not significant and Minoxidil 2% was borderline significant ( p = 0.0491) (see Figures 4 – 6 and Supplementary Appendix 1 ). 3.7.

Among women, there was a borderline significant decrease in 2020 in the age group 40–65 years (214 per 100,000; PI 215–273; p = 0.0491) (see Fig. 2 , fourth row).

One of the included studies genotyped rs11466445 in a Spanish cohort somewhat enriched for familial cancer, with ~15% of cases having an affected first-degree relative and found it to be borderline significant with diagnosis of CRC (p = 0.0491; 515 cases, 515 controls) [ 5 ].

Likelihood ratio testing demonstrated a borderline significant interaction between liner size and gender (p = 0.0493).

Borderline significant differences in the two groups resulted also for gender ( p = 0.0495) ( Table 2 ).

Whereas female neutered dogs more often had scMCTs than cMCT (94/299, 31.4% versus 301/1241, 24.2%) male intact dogs more often had cMCTs (503/1541, 32.6% versus 84/299, 28.1%) but the difference was only borderline significant ( P = 0.0495).

There were no significant correlations between MUFA, TRG and SFA against serotonin, but a borderline significant negative correlation between PUFA and serotonin ( r = - 0.3616, p = 0.0496, Fig. 4 , Table 2 ).

AISI showed a borderline significant negative association with DMFT ( β = −0.001, 95% CI −0.001 to 0.010, p = 0.0496), while SIRI, SII, NEU, IIC, and NLR showed similar negative trends with p -values between 0.05 and 0.10.

There was borderline significant differences between median ePASP (p=0.0496).

Although differences in HHS between the cemented and uncemented groups at six weeks were not statistically significant ( p = 0.2112), WOMAC scores demonstrated a borderline significant difference favoring the cemented group ( p = 0.0496), suggesting a potential early functional benefit associated with cemented fixation ( Table 2 ). 3.9.

4B show a borderline significant ( p = 0.0497) decrease of phage degradation in the presence of FSA as compared to control.

When comparing the results between the younger and older adults who received the same vaccine, there were no significant differences in the number of omicron-reactive IFNγ + CD4 + and IFNγ + CD8 + T cells in response to the spike or S/M/N/E peptide pool, except for in younger adults who received CoronaVac, who showed a higher number of CD4 + IFNγ + T cells using S/M/N/E peptide pool for stimulation, which was borderline significant (p=0·0498; appendix p 17 ).

The latent stability index showed a weak but borderline significant negative association with survival (ρ = −0.13 [−0.26, −0.01]; p = 0.0499).

Amikacin showed a borderline significant shift in susceptibility categories (χ2 = 6.00, p = 0.0499).

The difference in TEP levels after the second cycle of chemotherapy was borderline significant ( p = 0.0499; 52.1 ± 14.8 (20–76) vs. 81.8 ± 39.2 (34–146) ( Figure 2 ). 3.4.

After flowering, the factor wheat entry was borderline significant (χ 2 = 12.6, p = 0.0499), but pairwise comparisons revealed no differences among entries ( Figure 2 ).

Additionally, the increase of TIMP-1 mRNA level in cells incubated with NAC and 150 μmol/l H 2 O 2 was borderline significant ( p = 0.0499) compared with control cells.

There was a significant difference in the pre- and postoperative changes in anxiety and borderline significant ( p = 0.0499) changes in pain scores across the three surgical modalities.

There was a borderline significant overall effect of treatment ( F 1, 1.18 = 82.59, P = 0.05).