The spline function provided a significantly improved curve-fit in comparison to a linear function for MOF ( p = 0.01), but the improvement was only borderline significant for hip fracture ( p = 0.05).
← all phrases
“borderline significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
There was a borderline significant association between getting biological treatment and having erosions (OR = 3.61, 95% CI: 1.04–14.45, p = 0.050) and a significant association between biological treatment and having moderate/severe DAS28-CRP (OR = 35.83, 95% CI: 10.18–164.94, p < 0.001).
In the parsimonious model, HPV18 positivity remained borderline significant (adjusted OR = 4.17, 95% CI: 1.00–16.97; p = 0.050.
Although primiparous mothers had higher IgA concentration in colostrum (6.58 ± 1.30 g/L) than multiparous mothers (5.58 ± 1.50 g/L), yet the difference reached at borderline significant ( P = 0.05).
We found borderline significant correlation between the electroneurographic quotient and hypertension ( p = 0.050).
However, it is important to note that only three studies included in the analysis had high quality, which accounted for 19.01% of the weight of the aggregated meta-analysis results, and the findings in the moderate-quality studies were borderline significant ( p = 0.05).
In sustained ROSC to admission, a borderline significant decreased outcome was noted in the outdoor group (33.4% vs. 25.7%, P = 0.05), whereas the outcome of survival to hospital discharge and good neurological outcomes did not differ between 2 groups (11.6% vs. 8.1%, P = 0.19 in survival to hospital discharge; 6.9% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.09 in good neurological outcome). 3.3.
A borderline significant correlation was present when exciting with 440 nm (r = 0.57, p = 0.05) and 750 nm (r = 0.55, p = 0.06).
Operative vaginal delivery rate was found to be higher in the MSAF group than that of clear AF group, but the difference was only borderline significant (OR=1.5, 95% CI: 1.0–2.2, p =0.05).
Patients with DL had a larger volume of brainstem lesions ( p = 0.008) than patients without DL and the volume of cerebellar lesions was borderline significant ( p = 0.05 after correction for false discovery rate) (Table 2 ).
Impact of COVID-19 Our statistical analysis revealed that individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection had a higher risk of developing IBS compared to those without such a history, although this result was only borderline significant (OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.01–2.15, P = 0.050).
A borderline significant difference was observed between subgroups based on stimulant type ( p = 0.05).
Analyses limited to births at tertiary care centers (excluding primary and secondary institutions) showed a borderline significant association between fentanyl use and lower tension pneumothorax risk (Adjusted OR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01–0.99, p = 0.05).
A borderline significant protective effect of alignment in the FOH in the aligned group [HR after alignment with BL as the referent 0.22 (95% CI 0.05 to 1.03); P = 0.05] is contrasting a non-significant but rather adverse effect of alignment in the AT analysis [HR after alignment with BL as the referent 1.60 (95% CI 0.52 to 4.89); P = 0.41].
After adjustment for age, a significant f E/I difference between TSC and TDC remained [ F (1,36) = 6.79, p = 0.01, partial η 2 = 0.16], and the difference in absolute power became borderline significant [ F (1,36) = 4.0, p = 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.1].
Age-group was statistically significant ( p = 0.0004) in the model while sex was borderline significant ( p = 0.050).
We also found greater flexor tendon excursion in the patients with CTS than in the healthy volunteers, especially in the wrist extension position, although the difference was only borderline significant ( p = 0.05; Table 3 ).
This study found that patients with CeD, younger-onset diabetes, MS, asthma, and SLE were at higher risk of ALS, and the rate ratio for UC was borderline significant ( P = 0.05), and no significant difference was found for RA, psoriasis and CD.
SM had a significant deceleration of TL-mAA compared to NS (Tukey’s HSD test P = 0.008), and EC had a borderline significant decelaration of TL-mAA compared to NS (Tukey’s HSD test P = 0.05, Table 1 , F i g. 1 I).
Narrative length only had a borderline significant association with the intercept of exploration in breadth, β = 0.14, p = 0.050, and was not associated with any of the other intercepts or with any of the slopes, p ≥ 0.104.
A borderline significant difference in age was observed among the groups ( p = 0.05), with post-hoc analysis revealing that patients in the Myopi-X lenses group were significantly younger than those in the single vision lenses group ( p = 0.01) and the atropine 0.01% group ( p = 0.004).
However, the difference is borderline significant ( p = 0.05).
rs6783836 at ST6GAL1 was associated with HFS in patients treated with XELOX (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 2.1‐4.6, P = 4.3 × 10 −8 ) and was borderline significant in patients receiving capecitabine from QUASAR2, but with an opposite allele effect (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.42‐1.03, P = .05).
One test assessing executive functioning, Category Switching, was borderline significant, p = 0.050.
There was a negative correlation between linoleate clearance and concentration ( r = −0.79; P < 0.001) and a borderline significant correlation for palmitate ( r = −0.495; P = 0.05), but no significant correlation between clearance and concentration for oleate ( r = −0.29; P = not significant).