“borderline significant”

Albumin was borderline significant (r = 0.110, p = 0.049), while TMAO was not significantly correlated. 2.4.

The TUG test showed a borderline significant difference between fallers and non-fallers (14.84 vs. 20.19 seconds, p = 0.049), but the threshold used did not reliably distinguish fall risk.

Log serum tHcy concentration showed borderline significant (p = 0.049) positive association with fasting serum insulin concentration independent of age and BMI, only in men aged 60–74.

Other borderline significant parameters included the absence ATG in conditioning (HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1–2.3; p = 0.049), patient CMV seropositive status (HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1–2; p = 0.041), and HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplant (HR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1–2.8; p = 0.044) ( Supplementary Tables S5 and S6, Supplementary Figure S9 ).

The control group had a higher prevalence of previously known coronary artery disease compared to the STEMI group, with a borderline significant difference (83% vs. 28%, p = 0.049).

ERAS was associated with a borderline significant reduction in 30-day mortality (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.28–1.00, P = 0.049; Figure 6 ).

A monthly income exceeding 50,000 XAF also tended to be associated with higher screening uptake, although this result was borderline significant (aOR = 2.2 (1.0 ;5.0), p = 0.049).

Additionally, several subgroup analyses in our study yielded borderline significant results ( P ≈ 0.049–0.051).

Out of all analysed compartments, only one combination of muscular and femoral bone marrow compartments showed a borderline significant and rather weak correlation (quadriceps and greater trochanter, r = 0.375, p = 0.049).

A borderline significant association of the BER pathway with MI was also observed (P = 0.049).

There was a borderline significant difference in average diameter (p = 0.049) between 2% PFH loaded (n = 200, mean ± SD = 17.7 ± 2.8 μm, median 17.4 μm) and unloaded BMM (n = 200, 17.1 ± 3.8 μm, median 16.6 μm), but the distribution width of the loaded cells was smaller than that of the unloaded ones (p < 0.001).

However, surgeon preference demonstrated a borderline significant association, with one surgeon using PSI more frequently (χ2(1) = 3.32, P = 0.049, Cramér’s V = 0.13) (Table 1 ).

Responding to the aversive CS- was significantly less than chance ( p = 0.018), and also decreased as a function of time, but this effect was only borderline significant ( p = 0.049).

DM had a borderline significant association (AOR: 1.64, P = .049), indicating a potential link with poor sleep quality.

In the sensitivity analysis, additionally adjusted for smoking (Model B), the group coefficient became borderline significant (B = −0.018, 95% CI −0.037 to 0.000; p = 0.049), and smoking was positively associated with CVI (B = 0.024, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.044; p = 0.019).

The FcγRIIIB-NA2*03 was significantly associated with susceptibility to clinical malaria (OR = 2.67, 95%CI = 1.27–5.59, p = 0.0092) while the FcγRIIIB-SH allotype showed a borderline significant association with protection (OR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.18–1.00, p = 0.049) ( Figure 1B ).

Additionally, a borderline significant decline was observed in health region 11 (AAPC = − 11.79%, 95% CI: − 22.16 to − 0.04; P = 0.049), whereas health region 13 exhibited a statistically significant decline with an AAPC of − 11.19% (95% CI: − 22.44 to − 3.74; P = 0.006).

While considering sleep satisfaction as a continuous outcome, a borderline significant association was observed that the median of sleep satisfaction was higher in individuals without multimorbidity ( p = 0.049). 3.3 Association of Sleep Health Characteristics with multimorbidity Table 3 presents logistic regression models assessing the association between sleep patterns and multimorbidity.

When including VUS, FAT1 enrichment was borderline significant without correcting for multiple comparisons ( P = 0.049, FDR = 0.30), and no additional statistically significant genes were identified.

A borderline significant DTC risk reduction was observed in ERCC5 rs2227869 heterozygotes (adjusted OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.16-1.00, p = 0.049).

Fibrinogen γ demonstrated a borderline significant difference in the overall ANOVA analysis (P=0.049), while subsequent post hoc multiple comparisons did not identify any statistically significant differences between the groups (KDSS vs.

Kaplan–Meier curves suggested lower survival among patients with GNRI-defined nutritional risk, with a borderline significant difference between groups (log-rank p = 0.049) ( Figure 2 ).

The mean difference was -0.063, which was borderline significant (P = 0.049).

A borderline significant association was identified in the dominant model ( P =0.049), while a significant difference was observed in the recessive model ( P =0.019) ( Table 2 ).

61.8%, p < 0.001), while BMI category distribution showed only a borderline significant difference by residence ( p = 0.049).