“at the limit of significance”

Smoking was more frequent in patients with perfusion defect on MCE but the difference was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.053).

TAPSE/PASP remained significantly associated with a high risk of events using Cox univariate analysis (HR: 0.046; 95% CI [0.004–0.45], p = 0.009) but at the limit of significance in the clinical multivariate model (HR: 0.045; 95% CI [0.001–1.02], p = 0.053).

In multivariable analysis, only the following variables remained significant: pT status ≥ 3 (HR 5.24 [95% CI 2.41–11.39]; p < 0.001) and metachronous OPSCC (HR 0.32 [95% CI 0.14–0.72]; p = 0.006), with cN+ status at the limit of significance (HR 2.31 [95% CI 0.99–5.41]; p = 0.053) (Table 5 ).

A significant increase induced by salinity was measured only for ECTC, while trans-ferulic acid (TFRA) was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.053).

SOD levels were also depleted in the DOX Au-NP-treated animals, but with a p -value at the limit of significance ( p = 0.053).

The statistical analysis of Claudin 4 immunoexpression indicated values at the limit of significance in relation to the tumor grade (p=0.053, χ2 test), without associations with the histopathological type (p=0.291, χ2 test), and tumor stage (p=0.183, χ2 test).

As the VAT/SAT and WHR ratio increased, we observed lower concentrations of reduced glutathione; however, these differences were not statistically significant (although in the case of the WHR ratio, they were at the limit of significance p = 0.053; Table 3 and Table 4 ).

Being below 50 years of age was a protective factor at the limit of significance for the occurrence of LTPR ( p = 0.054) ( Table 3 , Figure 3 ).

Some variables did not affect the continuity of activity (gender, marital status, previous job, diagnosis and development region), while the level of education was at the limit of significance (p = 0.054).

The NRS score, which evaluates nutritional status, was found to be significant in the univariate analysis ( p = 0.048) but remained at the limit of significance in the multivariate analysis ( p = 0.054).

10.85 ± 1.68 ng/mL, P = 0.035 Figure 2 ] and had weak negative correlation with FEV1% at the beginning, at the limit of significance (Rho = −0.254, P = 0.054) and at the end of the follow-up period (Rho = −0.296, P = 0.028).

The patients with a mild necrozoospermia were younger than the others but the difference was at the limit of significance when compared to the moderate group ( p = 0.054).

Moreover, we observed a significant positive correlation between the mNC of the θ network and the tremor subscore of the MDS-UPDRS-III in female PD (r = 0.42, p = 0.030, BS-95 %CI [-0.01 0.67]), while among male PD patients, the same correlation was at the limit of significance (r = 0.30, p = 0.054, BS-95 %CI [-0.07 0.60]) ( Fig. 3 , Panel C).

Five cytokines were significantly increased in CF-derived MPs: G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-1-ra, IL-2 and IL-16 (p < 0.05) and Gro-α was at the limit of significance (p = 0.054).

The diabetic population not treated with metformin also presented a lower cancer-specific index, even if the p -value was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.054).

Our results show that plasma aldosterone concentrations were increased at the limit of significance ( p = 0.0548) in patients with endometriosis, while renin levels were significantly reduced and the ARR was significantly increased compared with healthy controls.

The difference was also significant in the DOF 4–8 group ( p = 0.002) and at the limit of significance in the DOF 1–3 group ( p = 0.055).

The test for hip flexion was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.055). 4.

Obese patients tended to progress to major LEA; however, this finding was at the limit of significance ( P = 0.055, adjusted residuals).

The percentage of esophagus volume receiving ≥30 Gy (V30) was at the limit of significance (p = 0.055).

Proteinuria was increased in the group with MetS, but in the comparison, a value at the limit of significance was obtained (p=0.055).

The multivariate analysis confirmed the association with response to previous chemotherapy ( p = 0.0356) and time to progression ( p = 0.0063), clearly impacting the choice of subsequent treatment; hemoglobin level was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.0553).

A high Gleason score increased at the limit of significance the risk of PCa specific death (HR = 3.34, p = 0.056; C-index = 0.81).

Although the overall differences in the training received in the different ICT usage groups are found only at the limit of significance (χ 2 = 9.23, p = 0.056), the DC-LC usage group stands out for having had less training opportunities (71.7% compared to 84.2% for all the groups; Adjusted Standardized Residual = −2.4, p < 0.05). 5.

But, the doses should be defined carefully as the tumour growth curves obtained in the present work after irradiation with doses of 7 Gy and 10.5 Gy are so close that the distinction of GD V5 is at the limit of significance (p = 0.056), whereas the GD V3 and GD V7 are significantly different.