“at the limit of significance”

The influence of CCDN1 A870G polymorphism was at the limit of significance (AA vs AG vs GG, p = 0.050, Figure 6 ), with GG patients exhibiting the poorest survival.

In addition, 4 atrial regions with LVZs were more frequently present at the limit of significance in elderly patients (3 [4.5%] vs 2 [0.7%]; P =.05) ( Figure 2 ).

At 24 h post-irradiation, the USH1 fibroblasts showed systematically more γH2AX foci 24 h post-irradiation (GM03889: 1.2 ± 0.2, GM03854: 1.5 ± 0.4, and GM03891: 0.9 ± 0.1 γH2AX foci per cell) than the radioresistant controls (0 ± 0.5 γH2AX foci per cell); however, these differences were at the limit of significance ( p = 0.05) ( Figure 3 A,B).

Atopic subjects tended to show a higher frequency of pruritus and sneezing of moderate to severe intensity (47.2%), although at the limit of significance ( p = 0.05).

According to our analysis, the recent administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy was not a significant risk factor for death in the overall cohort but slightly increased the risk of death in the sub-population of RT-PCR positive patients, at the limit of significance (OR = 1.53 95%CI: 1.00–2.34; p = 0.05).

Cd and Ca/Mg were decreased, and Cu was increased, in patients with respect to their healthy related controls at the limit of significance ( p = 0.0501).

Statistically, this difference in corrugator-supercilii activity seemed to be maintained even after deactivation and stimuls offset, F (4,104) = 3.04, p = 0.020, η2 = 0.10, and also presented a linear trend at the limit of significance, t (26) = 2.05, p = 0.0503, d = 0.395.

Mutual comparison between the R and NR epileptic patient groups using a Generalized Linear Model (GLM) results in no significant predictors (Age at epilepsy onset: p -value = 0.076, Age at VNS implantation: p -value = 0.070, Gender at the limit of significance: p -value = 0.0504, EEG measurement time before VNS implantation: p -value = 0.167, and type of epilepsy: p -value ≥0.485.

The sensitivity was better with DENV-1 than DENV-4 but this difference was at the limit of significance (70.2% vs 48.2%, p-value = 0.051).

Lastly, the deep breathing expiratory-to-inspiratory ratio (E/I ratio), one of the main cardiovagal parameters, was lower in patients, but such a difference was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.051).

The presence of radiological changes significantly increased the chances of prolonged hospitalization ( p = 0.029; OR = 0.002; 95% CI: 0.00–0.53), while the older age category was at the limit of significance in predicting a longer stay ( p = 0.051; OR = 0.011).

When compared to non-stimulated sequences, we observed a decrease for the stimulated sequences for the right LatFG only, although at the limit of significance (F6-F7: p = 0.051; F’3-F’4: p = 0.11; two-tailed paired permutation tests). 3.3.

The aggregated data across studies indicated that the incremental beliefs were associated with higher levels of students' achievement in Asia ( k = 9, r = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.07, 0.17; p < 0.001), Oceania (Australia) ( k = 8, r = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.09, 0.34; p < 0.001), and at the limit of significance in North America ( k = 33, r = 0.10, 95% CI = −0.00, 0.19; p = 0.051) but were not significant for Europe ( k = 20, r = 0.04; 95% CI = −0.01, 0.10; p = 0.119).

In a subgroup of 31 tests which met the maximality criteria, emphysematous patients presented a significantly lower work rate at peak (median value 51 vs 72% predicted, p =0.016), and showed a lower peak oxygen consumption, although at the limit of significance (median values of 63 vs 85 % predicted, p =0.051).

Sensitivity and specificity (for BI-RADS greater than or equal to 3) For example, using a BI-RADS greater than or equal to 3, we measured on average, that the sensitivity increased from 0.66 to 0.70, at the limit of significance ( p = 0.051).

These improvements were in total COMI score and in symptom-related and general QoL scores; improvement in the ODI was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.051; Tables 3 and 4 ).

There was no significant difference in the effect on the beta-endorphin concentration between the two doses of topiramate, as a dose 40 mg/kg was at the limit of significance in comparison to the control group ( p = 0.051).

However, IRAK1 mRNA expression in RTT patients <15 years old was lower at the limit of significance ( p = 0.051) than in the corresponding controls, while in RTT patients >15 years old it was higher ( p = 0.028) than in the corresponding controls ( Figure 1 B), suggesting nonlinear changes in IRAK1 expression with age.

Two-way ANOVA tests revealed a significant diet effect, being that the genotype effect was not significant and the interaction between the diet and genotype effects were at the limit of significance ( p = 0.0516). 3.3.

The two cohorts differed statistically based on the genotype distributions (χ 2 = 13.918; p = 0.0009 Fisher’s exact test) and allele frequencies of TAS1R3 SNPs (χ 2 = 13.776; p = 0.0010 Fisher’s exact test), the diplotype distributions (χ 2 = 8.248; p = 0.0181; Fisher’s exact test) and haplotype frequencies of TAS2R38 SNPs (χ 2 = 8.566; p = 0.0138; Fisher’s exact test), and the genotype distributions of CD36 SNP (χ 2 = 6.875; p = 0.032; Fisher’s exact test), while the allele frequencies for this locus was at the limit of significance (χ 2 = 5.887; p = 0.052; Fisher’s exact test).

Univariate and multivariate analyses After univariate analysis ( Table 8 ), the link between MCS score and refusal of treatment due to uncertainty about the date of hospitalization was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.052).

17%) and the duration of supplementary oxygen was longer, at the limit of significance (408 vs. 120 h, p = 0.052).

This difference was at the limit of significance ( P = 0.052) 150 ( Table 14 ). 4.4.4 | Clinical recommendations Tissue engineering strategies are safe treatment options for peri-implant bone reconstruction.

Multivariate analysis showed that patient outcome could be predicted by miRNA/mRNA expression profiles after the first ( p = 0.0064) and the third LuPRRT ( p = 0.0105), whereas Ki-67 index was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.0521) ( Table 3 ).

In multivariable analysis, only the following variables remained significant: pT status ≥ 3 (HR 5.24 [95% CI 2.41–11.39]; p < 0.001) and metachronous OPSCC (HR 0.32 [95% CI 0.14–0.72]; p = 0.006), with cN+ status at the limit of significance (HR 2.31 [95% CI 0.99–5.41]; p = 0.053) (Table 5 ).