“at the limit of significance”

A high Gleason score increased at the limit of significance the risk of PCa specific death (HR = 3.34, p = 0.056; C-index = 0.81).

The statistical analysis of E-cadherin immunoexpression revealed a significant association in relation to the HP type (p=0.001, χ2 test) and the tumor grade (p=0.001, χ2 test), as well as values at the limit of significance in relation to the tumor stage (p=0.056, χ2 test), the highest values of E-cadherin scores being observed in tubular carcinomas, those of low grade and in stage I–III (Figure 2A 2B 2C ).

Although the overall differences in the training received in the different ICT usage groups are found only at the limit of significance (χ 2 = 9.23, p = 0.056), the DC-LC usage group stands out for having had less training opportunities (71.7% compared to 84.2% for all the groups; Adjusted Standardized Residual = −2.4, p < 0.05). 5.

Also, some results remained at the limit of significance as surgical standing (P = 0.0562) and histological grade (P=0.0549).

For plasma melatonin, the ingestion of the PR form caused a progressive increase in concentrations, which was at the limit of significance at T10 (44.9 ± 68.8 pg/mL versus 4.6 ± 1.9 pg/mL at baseline, p = 0.057), then significant at the following times of sampling.

Regarding p53 protein, median values were higher in non-complete responding patients, although this observa- tion was at the limit of significance in the RChem group only (1.033 ng mg-1 in PR + failure patients vs 0.086 ng mg-1 in CR patients, P = 0.058).

This difference was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.058).

1.84 (1.35–2.66) mV, p = 0.002] and each regional ( p < 0.05) bipolar voltage amplitudes were lower in women except for the lateral wall at the limit of significance ( p = 0.059).

Gamma activity also, regardless of conditions, was greater at the limit of significance in the left hemisphere than in the right (F (1,15) = 4.165 p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.270).

For HIT gain, a difference at the limit of significance was found between the change in slopes ( p = 0.059), which did not prompt the use of a model calculating an age-adjusted difference (Fig. 2 ).

Regardless of not being statistically significant, the differences observed on the variables “existence of chronic diseases” (between groups defined by NEDA-3) and “anti-EBV IgG antibodies” (between groups defined by the “absence of MRI activity of disease” criterion) assumed p values at the limit of significance ( p = 0.059 and p = 0.055, respectively).

However, we observed a trend for the interaction between wounds evolution and time but at the limit of significance (p = 0.059).

Moreover, several qualitative and quantitative studies conducted in other cities in Morocco and other countries worldwide have identified physician perception as a factor that can influence generic prescribing.[ 11 , 14 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ] In our results, GPs’ perception that the quality of generics is high emerged in the multivariate analysis as an important factor influencing their prescription of these drugs (OR = 2.82 [1.08-7.36]), despite the result being at the limit of significance in univariate analysis ( P = 0.059).

In the final logistic regression model, an interaction at the limit of significance ( p = 0.059) was observed between gender and the presence of other children in the neighborhood with whom to play.

In the left pre-frontal area, the Cho/Cr values trended to be lower in the pHSP subjects compared to the HC group, but the difference was statistically at the limit of significance (0.79 ± 0.13 vs. 0.71 ± 0.11; p = 0.059, after adjustment for sex and age at T 0 ).

When the postnatal maternal depressive symptoms or the parental stimulation were added to the equation as mediating variables, associations between antenatal maternal anxiety symptoms and CDI scores were at the limit of significance (t value = 1.63, p = 0.06).

1c , Table 2 ; at the limit of significance in the case of DS, p = 0.06).

As shown in Figure 5E , miR-375 inhibitor transfection induced an increase of 1.52- and 1.35-fold in E6 expression in Ca Ski and SiHa cells respectively compared to control cells at the limit of significance ( p =0.06).

The inverse correlation between the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the incidence of snakebites is at the limit of significance (r = −0.36; p = 0.06).

In our study, the ADC is at the limit of significance (P=0.06) probably due to the small study population.

ST turned out interesting results: for the 5 m sprint we found only a value at the limit of significance ( p = 0.06) for ACTN3, showing XX individuals slower than the counterpart, in the recessive model (1.4 vs 1.2).

The levels of TXB2 were almost two times higher ( p ≤ 0.01, Cohen’s d = 1.12) in men who smoked than men who did not smoke, and in this group we also observed increased levels of NPD1 compared to male non-smokers (at the limit of significance, p ≤ 0.06 but Cohen’s d = 0.53) ( Table 2 ).

In multivariate analysis, the only prognostic factor associated with PASS at the limit of significance was the treatment allocated at inclusion, i.e. the use of PRP-HA (OR = 2.05 [1.07–3.92]; p = 0.06).

There was a difference, at the limit of significance (p = 0.06), in CXCL12 BM content among groups.

5 B; p < 0.05), confirmed by the histological analyses of colon tissue indicated by a decreased Ameho score, albeit at the limit of significance (Fig. 5 C,D; p = 0.06).