“at the limit of significance”

The complaints were also high for the teachers (63.8 ± 20.7) at the limit of significance ( p = 0.05) and with a greater dispersion.

At 24 h post-irradiation, the USH1 fibroblasts showed systematically more γH2AX foci 24 h post-irradiation (GM03889: 1.2 ± 0.2, GM03854: 1.5 ± 0.4, and GM03891: 0.9 ± 0.1 γH2AX foci per cell) than the radioresistant controls (0 ± 0.5 γH2AX foci per cell); however, these differences were at the limit of significance ( p = 0.05) ( Figure 3 A,B).

According to our analysis, the recent administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy was not a significant risk factor for death in the overall cohort but slightly increased the risk of death in the sub-population of RT-PCR positive patients, at the limit of significance (OR = 1.53 95%CI: 1.00–2.34; p = 0.05).

The difference in pFRS between the two groups was at the limit of significance ( P = 0.05), whereas the mean increase in pFRS in the central 4° was greater in the FS group (+2.43 ± 0.82 dB vs. +1.79 ± 0.86 dB; P = 0.037).

Additionally, the residual volume was significantly higher in the LV remod group (37.7 ± 17.7% vs 22.5 ± 10.1%, p < 0.001); the direct flow was significantly lower in the LV remod group (20.7 ± 7.3% vs 35.3 ± 8.2%, p < 0.001) while the retained inflow was at the limit of significance between both groups (22 ± 6.4% vs 18.6 ± 6%, p = 0.05).

Two-way ANOVA showed that vWAT weight was significantly affected both by the different genotypes and diets ( Figure 4 D) but not by their combination, although it was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.05).

The results showed that in patients with necrotising soft tissue infection, an increase in L-NMMA entailed an increase in arginine ( p < 0.0001), homoarginine ( p = 0.027), and ADMA ( p < 0.0001); there was also a positive correlation between arginine and homoarginine ( p = 0.029) and arginine and ADMA ( p = 0.007); the correlation between homoarginine and IL-10 was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.050); the other correlations did not reach statistical significance ( Figure 4 A).

In HFHS‐fed females, but not males, the 24 h total caloric intake was higher compared with chow‐fed female Arvicanthis , although this effect was at the limit of significance ( F (1,15) = 4.25, P = 0.05; Fig. 4 F).

All biomarkers showed potential to identify healthy sites in the crude model ( p < 0.05), but only MMP-8 remained significant in the adjusted model, with OPG at the limit of significance ( p = 0.05).

Atopic subjects tended to show a higher frequency of pruritus and sneezing of moderate to severe intensity (47.2%), although at the limit of significance ( p = 0.05).

No factor influenced blood loss in our series; the ABC score was at the limit of significance (p=0.05).

For the rs1800629 TNF-α polymorphism, the GA + AA genotypes showed a significant association ( p = 0.038) with the presence of unfavorable histology and were at the limit of significance ( p = 0.05) with high-risk category and INSS stage 4; however, there were no associations with other prognostic factors ( Table A1 ).

The mean maximum CRP concentration was also higher in patients with stricture, but this difference was at the limit of significance (p = 0.05).

In addition, the values determined in super-tasters at 2.5 s were higher than those of non-tasters ( P = 0.0012; Newman-Keuls test) and of medium taster, although at the limit of statistical significance ( P = 0.05; Newman-Keuls test), and those of PAV/PAV subjects were higher than those of AVI/AVI subjects, also in this case at the limit of significance ( P = 0.05; Newman-Keuls test).

Finally, the use of a Phasix ST mesh was at the limit of significance in terms of recurrence compared to standard Phasix mesh (HR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.00–2.29; p = 0.05).

There was only a weak respiratory rate decrease, minus 2/min for each additional 10 mg terbutaline dose, with P value at the limit of significance ( P < 0.05).

[ 20 ] reported a positive association at the limit of significance (β = 0.0044; p = 0.05) between serum concentrations of DL-PCB 167 and whole-body BMD (measured by DXA), after adjustment for several confounding factors.

The interaction between the two factors, at the limit of significance [ F (3,42) = 2.82, p = 0.050, η 2 p = 0.168] was given by participants’ sensitivity being higher for the full vision condition [ M = 4.04, SE = 0.16], as compared to the limited vision condition [ M = 3.75, SE = 0.19], only when participants were lifting the object [ t (14) = 2.91, p = 0.011, r = 0.858].

Association of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid intake with pulse wave velocity In age- and sex-adjusted analyses, DHA and EPA were negatively associated with PWV at the limit of significance {see Supplementary material online , Table S3 , β [95% confidence interval (CI): −0.39 (−0.78; −0.007); −0.56 (−1.13; 0.01), respectively, P = 0.05 for both]}.

In NTK group, significant changes were found in PT, SS and pelvic obliquity between pre-operatively and immediate post-operatively, independently of age ( P < 0.05), although the change in PT was at the limit of significance in young adults ( P = 0.05), and all these changes were normalized to pre-operative values at 1-year follow-up ( P > 0.05).

A time x treatment group interaction was also observed at the limit of significance ( F (4,456) = 2.4, p = 0.05) with an increase for Pick-Klop and waiting list between T0 and T1.

Limiting the analysis to patients with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in 21 high UpH versus 37 low UpH sCr was significantly lower ( p = 0.004), eGFR higher at the limit of significance ( p = 0.05), and FE α 1m significantly lower ( p = 0.03).

For the BMI model, if the duration of rice production availability was added, out of the 586 remaining subjects, household size kept the same effect, water source became non-significant, and the added variable had an effect at the limit of significance (AOR = 0.92 [0.84–1.00], p = 0.050).

In analog experiments, the difference of the noncoated granule labeling between 5 and 90 rain was at the limit of significance (P < 0.05).

In addition, 4 atrial regions with LVZs were more frequently present at the limit of significance in elderly patients (3 [4.5%] vs 2 [0.7%]; P =.05) ( Figure 2 ).