PGLYRP4 exon 2, c.37A>C Ile13Leu, exon 6 c.575G>T Gly188Val, and exon 9, c.*416A>C, UTR variants may associate with CD or with gender in CD patients PGLYRP4 exon 2, c.37A>C, Ile13Leu (SNP rs30006458), was differentially distributed in CD females compared with CD males and the AA genotype was approaching significance ( P = 0.06, Table S16 ).
← all phrases
“approaching significance”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
However, it is worth noting that self-reported TST was approaching significance in favour of the intervention group ( p = 0.06).
Students in the highest grade had the lowest proportion of no headache or disease-related headaches (12.5%) as compared to those in the lower grades (39.5%), χ2 (4) = 16.98, p < 0.01, and students in the town had higher proportion of no headache or disease-related headaches (43.6%) than those in the city (35.0%), an association approaching significance, χ2 (1) = 3.53, p = 0.06 when controlled for grade.
Control IntCB 1 +/+ mice displayed robust preferences for WD when compared to SD, an effect largely absent in IntCB 1 −/− mice by 3 h ( Figure 5 a, from 92.8 ± 2.8% total kcals from WD in IntCB 1 +/+ mice compared to 46.5 ± 12.5% in IntCB 1 −/− mice; p = 0.029), and approaching significance during the 3–6 h interval ( Figure 5 b, from 96.2 ± 3.8% total kcals from WD in IntCB 1 +/+ mice compared to 46.9 ± 16.5% in IntCB 1 −/− mice; p = 0.06).
Regarding emotion regulation, the moderation analysis for brooding rumination and PTSD symptoms was approaching significance, R 2 change = 0.01, F (1,199) = 3.56, p = 0.06.
All data were presented as mean ± SEM, with significance reported as P ≤ 0.05, and values approaching significance were reported as P = 0.06–0.10.
However, there was a correlation approaching significance for the past ( p = 0.06) and current ( p = 0.07) use of escitalopram (data not shown).
The peak angle of cavefish was reduced, approaching significance ( p = .06), while the angular speed was also reduced (Figure 2e,f ) consistent with a previous report that the escape response is blunted in cavefish (Paz et al., 2020 ).
In fibroblasts exposed to cortisol and simulated microgravity, this dose effect was, however, not observed (this four-way interaction was approaching significance ( p = 0.06)).
Neurologists were also more likely to indicate ‘time availability’ as a reason for not discussing SUDEP than nurses (approaching significance, p = 0.06).
Early Processing: 250- to 500-Millisecond Time Bin The interaction between the test session and the participant group was found to be approaching significance ( F 1,38 =3.881; P =.06; η p 2 =0.093).
In contrast, thermocycling significantly decreased the μTBS of CAD ( p = 0.03), although HOCl pretreatment was shown to stabilize μTBS in CAD, approaching significance ( p = 0.06).
trending toward significancep = 0.06
Further, the age at which participants began ART treatments was approaching significance in its relationship with Hannum EAA (0.55 [-0.03, 1.12 ], p = 0.06) and the number of years on ARTs association with Hannum EAA was trending toward significance (− 0.55 [− 1.12, 0.03], p = 0.06).
Multivariate analysis revealed that heart disease (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.070–6.793, P = 0.035), T-stage (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.340–2.840, P < 0.001), and N-stage (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.102–2.739, P = 0.017) were independent prognostic factors for DFS, with age approaching significance ( P = 0.061).
However, similar to the FDI, there was no main effect of STIMULATION, although it was approaching significance ( F 1,12 = 4.287; p = 0.061), nor were there any BLOCK × STIMULATION interactions ( F 2,24 = 0.1, p = 0.905).
Averaged across burger types, the main effect of information sharing group was approaching significance (F(1,1716) = 5.1, p = 0.061, η p 2 < 0.01), suggesting that the video had very limited influence on liking in general.
This contrast was significant for Disgusting (the morphed agents were evaluated as more disgusting than the pure non-morphed human and robot agents; F (1, 217) = 4.5, B = -0.82, 95% CI [-1.58, -0.06], p = .034), Friendly (the human and robot agents were evaluated as more friendly F (1, 271) = 4.9, B = 0.81, 95% CI [0.91, 1.53], p = .027), and approaching significance for Approachable (the morphed agents were less approachable; F (1, 217) = 3.5, B = -0.8, 95% CI [-1.65, 0.04], p = .061); all other measures were non-significant ( F s < 3.5; p s = n.s.).
The impact of low SDR on efficiency reduction was greater for pallidotomy, approaching significance ( p = 0.061).
CB exposure caused a dose-dependent decrease in viability within the alveolar triple cell co-culture, approaching significance at the highest CB concentration ( p = 0.061) (Fig. 5 D and E).
The post-pre difference of the PANAS-SF scores showed a higher correlation of ρ = 0.58 with the regulation success in NF3 and was the only value approaching significance ( p = 0.061).
cfDNA+ patients more frequently had a higher ECOG performance status (LL3: P =0.0029; LL6: P =0.0022), greater tumour burden (measured as the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; approaching significance in LL3: P =0.061; LL6: P =0.0001), more metastatic sites (LL3: P =0.0003; LL6: P <0.0001), and metastases to the bone (LL3 and LL6: P <0.0001) and liver (LL3: P <0.0001; LL6: P =0.0003; Table 2 ).
In contrast, TD children also showed a significant difference between overt pronouns and null pronouns ( p < 0.001), as well as subject DPs ( p < 0.001), but the difference between null pronouns and subject DPs was approaching significance ( p = 0.061), a consequence of the fact that the TD children used more null subjects than subject DPs.
Analysis demonstrated MTX utilization prevalence in the SNs group (70.6%) surpassing the non-SNs group (44.7%), approaching significance (p=0.061).
Also 20-mCoDB reported better PRE performances for RTG (Δ = – 4%, estimated differences = – 0.33 s) than SSG, but only approaching significance (p = 0.061).
There were no significant group differences in demographic variables, although the difference between the three groups in racial composition was approaching significance (Monte Carlo two-sided significance test, p = .061, 99% CI [.055, .067]).