Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approached significance”

8,238 sentences · 8,238 papers · 9,796 search hits before verification

In the literature

approached significanceP < .12.0× alpha
After adjusting for other neighborhood characteristics and correcting for multiple hypothesis testing using Holm-Bonferroni method to control the familywise error rate, 71 there was a significant correlation between Twitter-based net healthiness scores and the mortality rate from heart failure ( P < .05), and the relationship with kidney failure mortality approached significance ( P < .1).
approached significancep < . 12.0× alpha
In contrast, correlations of working memory LNS scores to sequence identification approached significance ( p < . 1 ) only with the incoherent sequences, suggesting a greater role of working memory abilities in listening tasks when listeners cannot rely on contextual cues.
approached significancep < 0.102.0× alpha
Fall SWI CCTST pretest mean total scores were higher than control pretest mean total scores and approached significance (0.09 < p < 0.10, KW ANOVA), so we did an ANCOVA analysis to control for higher SWI pretest mean scores by using them as a covariate ( 20 ).
approached significancep = .1012.0× alpha
For hazard reaction time there were no main effects or interactions, although the difference between groups approached significance, F (1,33) = 2.84, p = .101, η p 2 = 0.079, indicating a trend towards those with ASD ( M = 0.26, SD = 0.90) responding more slowly than comparison participants ( M = −0.16, SD = 0.70).
approached significancep = 0.1022.0× alpha
In addition, MEM estimates showed a significant positive effect between Bb+ and Canine LD (2.66 Canine LD cases per 100 k for every 1% higher Bb+, p = 0.028) and a weaker positive effect between Bb+ and Human LD that approached significance (0.04 Human LD cases per 100 k for every 1% higher Bb+, p = 0.102).
approached significanceP = 0.1022.0× alpha
Relative to women with exposure to neither agent who experienced increases in BMD in each region (Table 2 ), the decline was statistically significantly different for lumbar spine [adjusted mean difference in percent change = −3.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) −5.13 to −1.56, P = 0.001] and for total hip (adjusted mean difference in percent change = −2.24, 95% CI −3.87 to −0.60, P = 0.009) and approached significance for the femoral neck (adjusted mean difference in percent change = −1.71, 95% CI −3.73 to 0.31, P = 0.102).