“approached significance”

Healthy trophoblast expressed 1 miRNA, miR-148b , which approached significance (p<0.10), at a higher level than arresting trophoblast.

For cases where the interaction p-value was or approached significance (p<0.10), we conducted analyses stratified by race, presentedin Tables 2 and 3 .

In the group of oral cavity/oropharynx, Actinobacteria and Actinomyces approached significance in low T-stage patients relative to higher stages ( p = 0.100, p = 0.192, respectively), while Parvimonas remained decreased among low T-stage patients ( p = 0.006) [ 47 ].

towards earlier arrival) of which eight were significant and four approached significance (0.05<p<0.10).

However, S426A/S430A mutant mice trended to eat more than wildtypes at 1 hour, and this value approached significance (p = 0.10, unpaired t-test).

All independent variables that were statistically significant or approached significance at p < 0.10 in the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis.

Associations approached significance (0.05< p <0.10) in Canada (OR=1.58; 0.98, 2.57; p =0.062), Norway (OR=1.81; 95% CI: 0.98, 3.33; p =0.058), and the USA (OR=1.22; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.51; p =0.079), but the confidence intervals overlapped 1.

Upon multivariate survival analysis, TRAP activity was associated with the greatest hazard ratio and approached significance most closely (HR = 5.67, p = 0.10); however, low cohort size limited statistical power (Table S2).

Multivariable analysis of predictors for vaccine receipt Variables whose association with vaccination status approached significance (P-value ≤0.1) were fitted in a multivariable logistic regression model (Table 5 ).

Variables that were significant or approached significance ( P < 0.10) within each category in the stepwise analyses were included together in a comprehensive model.

Given the exploratory nature of the research, and relatively small sample size, we also noted cases where relationships approached significance (i.e., 0.05 < p < 0.10).

Two‐way interactions between group and relative work rate approached significance for EILV ( P = 0.10), EELV/FVC ( P = 0.07), and IRV ( P = 0.10).

The change in LDL-C approached significance (112.1 vs. 98.0 mg/dL; P <.10) among those with diagnosed hyperlipidemia despite the relatively low baseline LDL-C and a high baseline use of statin therapy. 19 To assess the effects of lifestyle changes alone, additional analyses were conducted among patients with T2DM, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia whose medication regimen was stable or reduced during the 6-month study period.

‘Different phase reversed’ pairs also led to greater RTs than ‘different phase natural’ pairs, but this difference only approached significance ( P < 0.10).

Additionally, the correlation between the rate of growth along the short sulcal axis and heritability of sulcal depth was negative and approached significance ( r = −0.60; p < 0.10), while the same trend for long axis was positive and not significant ( p = 0.3; p = 0.40).

However, two interactions approached significance at the p < 0.10 level.

Variables were force-entered into this model if their association with the dependent (categorical) variable approached significance (p < 0.1).

Differences were considered statistically significant if the p-value was below 0.05 or approached significance within the range of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1.

However, the correlation for item #13 only approached significance, p < 0.10.

Two trials approached significance (0.05 < P < 0.10) and seven trials did not approach statistical significance ( P > 0.10). “Success” rates were never below chance expectations.

Maximum likelihood was used to calculate standardized regression estimates, factor score weights, confidence ratios, and p-values for each path, with alpha values for path relationships set at p < 0.05 and approached significance when p < 0.10.

The effect of housing approached significance ( p < 0.1).

There was an interaction effect with BMI for LMR reduction that approached significance ( p =0.10).

When a difference between groups approached significance ( p < 0.1) according to ANOVA, a rank‐transformed Welch's t ‐test for non‐parametric data was used to determine if differences existed between responses from DVM2 and other cohorts. 17 Ranked ANOVA was also used to determine if there were significant differences between previous use of ChatGPT (used before, heard of but never used) and Likert item responses.

All regions that showed significant FA or AD differences remained statistically significant ( p < 0.05) or approached significance ( p ≤ 0.10) when the total sample was broken into subgroups according to scanner location (BMC, CCN).