Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approached significance”

8,238 sentences · 8,238 papers · 9,796 search hits before verification

In the literature

approached significanceP = 0.081.6× alpha
Results Comparisons of fat scores No species showed significant between-habitat differences in fat scores, although the difference in fat scores for yellow-rumped warblers ( Setophaga coronata ) in autumn approached significance ( F 1,51 = 6.37, P = 0.08), with greater fat scores from corridors than from woodlots.
approached significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
The correlation between the traders' 2D∶4D and their Sharpe Ratios, however, while displaying the expected sign, only approached significance at the 5% level (n = 47, r = −0.26, p = 0.08).
A note on trader Sharpe Ratios.
PLoS One · 2009 · PMC2776986
approached significancep = .081.6× alpha
In addition, the overall main effect for length approached significance, F (1, 17) = 3.47, p = .08, η p 2 = .17, OP = .42 (five-letter strings: M = 6.16%, SD = 3.99; three-letter strings: M = 5.46%, SD = 3.44), whereas the familiarity-by-length interaction was significant, F (1, 17) = 5.03, p = .04, η p 2 = .23, OP = .56, with a significant length effect for pseudowords (five-letter strings: M = 7.17%, SD = 4.73; three-letter strings: M = 5.43%, SD = 3.50), t (17) = −2.73, p = .01, but not real words (three letters: M = 5.48%, SD = 3.63; five letters: M = 5.14%, SD = 3.89), t (17) = 0.62, p = .55.
approached significancep≤0.081.6× alpha
These results show that expression of extracellular matrix genes COL3A1, COL5A1, COL11A1 and FN1 are significantly increased in muscle-invasive bladder tumors relative to Ta/T1 (p<0.05), while changes in CDC25C, MAPK10 and ErbB3 expression approached significance (p≤0.08) ( Table 4 ).
approached significanceP =0.081.6× alpha
GSTM1 null genotype was significantly more frequent in atherosclerotic patients than in controls (52.0% vs 34.1%) and individuals with the GSTM1 null genotype had an approximately 2-fold increase in atherosclerosis risk (OR: 2.1, 95%CI=1.39-3.17, P=0.0004). GSTT1 null genotype alone did not show a statistically significant effect on atherosclerosis risk modulation, but the association approached significance (OR: 1.57, 95%CI=0.94-2.64, P =0.08).