Barely Significant
← all phrases

“approached significance”

8,238 sentences · 8,238 papers · 9,796 search hits before verification

In the literature

approached significancep = .081.6× alpha
Post hoc analyses revealed that the difference between typing and verbal responses approached significance in list lengths of 2 ( F (1,74) = 3.08, p = .08, η p 2 = 0.02), was significant in favor of verbal responses for list lengths of 3 ( F (1,74) = 5.79, p = .019, η p 2 = 0.04), and not significant for list of 4 ( F (1,74) = 0.04, p = 1.0) and 5 ( F (1,74) = 1.68, p = .198) numbers.
approached significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
All other groups show reduced variance in bi-modal, relative to uni-modal conditions for visual responses: compare dark and light green bars in Fig 3 , this approached significance for 6–7 year olds and 8–9 year olds ( p = 0.08, p = 0.07 for groups 6–7 and 8–9 years, all other age groups p >0.1, from paired t -tests).
approached significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
No significant correlations between the parameters of individual performance and pre-race HRV parameters or pre- versus post-race changes in HRV parameters were found, although an inverse correlation between pNN50 and the marathon time approached significance (r = − 0.37, p = 0.08, Table 5 ).
approached significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
Secondary outcomes The median [IQR(range)] peri-operative change in PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio in the PDT group was + 5.5 [− 29.3—34.8 (− 328.6–540.4)] mmHg, compared to − 2.1 [− 67.1–32.4 [− 253.2–130.8)] mmHg in the ST group, which approached significance ( p = 0.08, Table 2 ).
approached significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
The RANOVA of the PCN amplitudes yielded a significant main effect of task, F (1,13) = 6.61, p < 0.05, η 2 p = 0.43; the main effect of task sequence non-significant ( F < 1); the task × task sequence interaction approached significance, F (1,13) = 3.70, p = 0.08, η 2 p = 0.22), owing to the fact that switching task tended to increase the PCN amplitude for the detection task (−2.12 μV and −2.22 μV for detection → detection and discrimination → detection sequences, respectively), while tending to decrease the amplitude for the discrimination task (−2.52 and −2.29 μV for discrimination → discrimination and detection → discrimination sequences, respectively).
approached significancep = .081.6× alpha
The 2 × 2 × 2 (Congruency × Format match × Participant group) ANOVA on subtractive priming showed a significant interaction between Congruency and Participant group, F (1, 34) = 5.81, p < .05, and an interaction between Format match and Participant group that approached significance, F (1, 34) = 3.27, p = .08.
approached significanceP = .081.6× alpha
For the amyloid-positive group using the 2-SD threshold (n = 49), the SUVR × time interaction was again significant for episodic memory (Est [SE] = −1.33 [0.54]; P = .02), and approached significance for MMSE (Est [SE] = −1.91 [1.05]; P = .08) (eTable 4 and eFigure 3 in the Supplement ).