Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a trend towards significance”

2,761 sentences · 2,761 papers · 3,605 search hits before verification

In the literature

In our study we did not see any significant correlation between HER2 overexpression and histological grades of tumour, although a trend towards significance is observed with well differentiated histology being more commonly seen in HER2 positive cases (P=0.051).
a trend towards significanceP = 0.0511.0× alpha
For every 1-s increase in TUG time (indicating poorer performance), the change in the odds of scoring (or showing better performance) in MMSE [OR = 1.157, (95% CI: 1.012, 1.322)] was higher in obese compared to normal weight men, with a trend towards significance in CVLT (OR [95% CI]: 1.056 [1.000, 1.115], P = 0.051).
a trend towards significanceP = .0511.0× alpha
did not reach statistical significanceP = .0511.0× alphaplainly factual
Specifically, a significant increase in male overall SSB consumption trends over the 16 year time period was observed ( P = .048 for trend analysis); although the differences in male overall SSB consumption between NHANES III versus NHANES 1999–2004 did not reach statistical significance when the data were analyzed in aggregate, the analysis suggested a trend towards significance ( P = .051).
a trend towards significancep =0.0511.0× alpha
In the MuTHER dataset, the linear model for methylation at cg22563815 (Expression ~ cg22563815*bisulfite conversion concentration*bisulfite conversion efficiency*rs7164030) showed a trend towards significance ( t =−1.95, p =0.051, β=−2.34; Fig. 4c ), while methylation at cg17108064 (Expression ~ cg17108064*batch*bisulfite conversion efficiency*rs7164030) did not predict expression ( t =1.48, p =0.14, β=0.99; Fig. 4d ).
a trend towards significancep=0.05121.0× alpha
However, there was a significant association between high/medium endothelial TGFβ response signature (E-TBRS) and complete response when all time points were combined ( Supplementary Figure 3Fiii , Fisher exact test p=0.0253), and a trend towards significance with all timepoints combined for the macrophage signature (M-TBRS, Supplemental Figure 3Diii , Fisher exact test p=0.0512).
a trend towards significancep = .05171.0× alpha
The three patients with non-significant difference from the healthy control group were the LIS patient (which was expected to have normal ICD since his consciousness level is identical to a healthy control), one Coma patient (which showed a trend towards significance, p = .0517) and one VS patient (which would be expected to have decreased correlation values).