“a trend toward significance”

For the Bias scores both groups did better during the ‘post’ session and overall the CG had a better bias score but no difference was significant: the ANOVA revealed a trend toward significance for the main effect of Session, F (1,46) = 4.03, p = 0.05, η 2 p = 0.08 with both groups increasing their scores in the post-testing session, and there was a non-significant trend in the main for Group as well, F (1,46) = 3.72, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.075 with the CG trending toward higher scores.

It is plausible that this node could be used as a “compensatory mechanism” during social situations in ASD individuals, although our results only show a trend toward significance ( p = .05) so we must consider this result with caution.

In this study, the primary endpoint results of HVLT decline did not reach statistical significance ( P < .05), although there was a trend toward significance for HVLT decline ( P = .059) as well as a statistically significant benefit seen with the compositive cognitive toxicity endpoint.

Furthermore, a trend toward significance (p=0.05) was also observed in the type III CZ-Simkova group for GRA6-III-44 vs.

While SS standing showed a trend toward significance ( P = .050), SS sitting was significantly different, with the stiff group having the highest value (24.33° ± 10.84°) compared to the normal (18.82° ± 11.37°) and hypermobile (1.63° ± 19.38°) groups ( P < .001).

A trend toward significance was observed for the PANSS General Psychopathology subscale ( p = 0.05, d = 0.71).

There was a trend toward significance among urban females who adhered to an animal products DP and the risk of developing T2D (IRR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.0, 8.3, P = 0.05), though this observation was not statistically significant when data were stratified by sex and by site, as seen in Supplementary Table 2A‒F .

The SDMT showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.05).

A trend toward significance was noted for the correlation between HIF1 α expression and depth of invasion ( p = 0.050).

When added as a covariate to the primary apathy model, SSRI use showed a trend toward significance ( β = 0.75, 95% CI −0.001–1.49, P = 0.05), while the association between change in anxiety and apathy remained robust ( β = 1.57, 95% CI 0.73–2.44, P = 0.0003).

A trend toward significance was also found between the sham and 1 mA conditions in the 10–15 min interval during stimulation, t (11) = 2.16, p = 0.05.

Although the p -value indicates a trend toward significance, the result does not exceed the significance threshold ( p < 0.05, OR = 2.2).

Indeed, Kianga exhibited significantly more affiliative behaviors in the RS period, whereas a trend toward significance ( p = 0.05) was reported for Lubaya.

[ 33 ] While there were no differences in the distribution or number of diseased vessels in the statin and non-stain group, non-statin treatment group had an increased prevalence of triple vessel disease and a trend toward significance ( P = .05).

A trend toward significance was with the lowest dynamic range CDR (quartile 1) having the highest perceived stress (p = 0.05).

For FA analysis, three-way ANOVA revealed no significant main effects of side and parcel, but a trend toward significance was found for the main effect of diagnosis (F = 8.116; p = 0.05), with SZ patients exhibiting slightly lower FA values (mean difference = 0.036).

Regarding SPLCS, migration showed a trend toward significance (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.03–1.11, p = 0.050).

The AirINTrial, which involved 500 lung resection patients, found that the incidence of prolonged air leakage (defined as still having a chest drain in place 7 days after surgery) was not significantly different in patients in whom external suction was used, compared to those without suction (10% versus 14%, respectively, P = 0.2), although a trend toward significance favoring the use of external suction was seen in patients undergoing anatomical resection (9.6% versus 16.8%, P = 0.05) (Leo et al. 2013 ).

Although these differences indicated a trend toward significance, they did not consistently reach statistical significance ( p < 0.05).

To calculate the prognostic score based on methylome analysis (“methylome score”), we adopted the following scoring system: 0.5 points: assigned to negative prognostic factors with a trend toward significance at Kaplan-Meier analysis (.1 > P ≥ .05); these parameters were not included in multivariable Cox analysis; 1 point: assigned to negative prognostic factors significant at Kaplan-Meier analysis (.05 > P ≥ .01), but not significant at multivariable Cox analysis. 2 points: assigned to negative prognostic factors highly significant at Kaplan-Meier analysis ( P < .01), but not significant at multivariable Cox analysis. 4 points: assigned to negative prognostic factors significant at multivariable Cox analysis.

Furthermore, while there was a trend toward significance between the EPSS and academic GPA ( P = 0.05), statistically the association was unremarkable.

While complete blood cell count, red blood cell count, and platelet number remained stable throughout the experimental timeline (data not shown), we observed a transient reduction in white blood cell counts during the weeks of the WBI protocol, which exhibited a trend toward significance ( p = 0.05–0.33 vs.

The AE group also showed significant effects of time on RTs ( F (2, 32) = 14.17, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.469), with significant improvements from Pre to Post-0 ( t = 7.28, p = 0.0003, d = 1.24) and a trend toward significance from Post-0 to Post-20 ( t = 3.533, p = 0.05, d = 0.61).

IPI showed a trend toward significance at the overall level ( p = 0.095), whereas the high-intermediate/high-risk IPI category reached borderline significance in pairwise comparison (HR = 4.720, p = 0.050).

Due to the small sample size, the p -value did not reach statistical significance; however, a trend toward significance ( p < 0.05) was observed.